Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Greed Is Good (In the Appropriate Context)

By Matthew Yglesias
Oct 24 2007, 7:47 AM ET Comment

It seems that some of my libertarian friends have been miffed recently by liberal allegations that they're greedy. Insofar as I wanted to make the allegation stick, I would argue that rightwing pundits and so forth are greedy not because they stand to reap enormous personal financial benefits from their pro-rich-people political agenda, but because they stand to reap relatively enormous personal financial benefits from their willingness to argue the pro-rich-people line. There's more money to be made in the field of conservative political activism and propaganda work, because the right's activist institutions are better-financed.

That said, I would strongly, strongly, strongly caution liberals against making non-greediness some kind of core political virtue. There's a certain strand of self-regard, a shortsighted meanness of spirit and neglect of public purpose, that's incompatible with the spirit of modern egalitarian liberalism, but mostly the whole point of the enterprise is to convince people that liberalism will make you better off. It won't, of course, make literally everyone better off, but the pitch is that the vast majority of people would benefit from living in a society with high quality public services, adequate environmental protections, a foreign policy focused on international cooperation, and a healthy regard for individual autonomy.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Michigan: A Firewall for Romney—or the Bonfire of His Hopes? Michigan Will Decide the Fate of the GOP Race
The 10 Most Expensive Cities in the World (and How They Got That Way) The World's Most Expensive Cities (and How They Got That Way)
Greece Is on Pace for the Worst Recession in Modern History Why the Greek Recession Could Get Much Worse
Study of the Day: How We Really Read Restaurant Menus How We Read Restaurant Menus
Tiger Woods Should See a Psychiatrist Tiger Should See a Psychiatrist

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
A 150th-anniversary commemorative issue, with Atlantic work by Mark Twain, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Frederick Douglass, and others. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)