Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

The Wages of Obstruction

By Matthew Yglesias
Sep 21 2007, 9:08 AM ET Comment

congressapprove.png

Via Chris Bowers this curious Gallup poll result on rising congressional approval -- a phenomenon driven almost entirely by Republicans. The partisan breakout on congressional approval here is crucial to understanding the low ratings the congress gets. Rather than a case of liberal overreach alienating people, the issue here is that for a Democrat-controlled institution, the congress is horribly unpopular with Democrats.

This turns out to be the wages of constant filibustering. When the Democrats were in the minority, every effort they made at blocking the GOP agenda was greeting with conservative efforts to psyche them out, often re-enforced by lazy centirsts in the press, all centered around the idea that there'd be some dire price to be paid for obstruction. American politics does not, in fact, appear to function this way. Minority party obstructionism, whether of the Clinton administration's initiatives in 1993, or the Pelosi/Reid leadership's initiative in 2007, actually seems to generate a sense that the majority has "failed" rather than a sense of outrage aimed at the minority.

This is why I'm skeptical that any of these big picture health care reforms can possibly pass. It's going to be very much in the interests of the Republican to block ay such proposals -- irrespective of their content -- and the rewards to wavering Democrats for abandoning the reform side will be large.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Using the Internet as Matchmaker: The Drawbacks to Online Dating Internet as Matchmaker: The Drawbacks to Online Dating
12 Hours at CPAC, the 'Mardi Gras of the Right' 12 Hours at the Right's 'Mardi Gras'
SNL's Zooey Deschanel Episode: 5 Best Scenes The 5 Funniest Sketches From SNL's Zooey Deschanel Episode
Whitney Houston Has Died Whitney Houston's Greatest Hits
Will the Grammys Remain as Bizarre as Always This Year? Our Predictions for 'Music's Biggest Night'

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

The Civil War, Part 3: The Stereographs

Feb 10, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)