Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

More Huckamania

By Matthew Yglesias
Sep 1 2007, 8:16 AM ET Comment

Noam Scheiber notes that the ONE Campaign's Iowa Poll "shows Huckabee tied with Fred Thompson at 11, with the two of them only a point behind Giuliani." They're still all way behind Mitt Romney, but his campaign is getting some traction. Meanwhile, Reihan Salam emailed to point out that Huckabee's quite young, and could very plausibly run again in 2012 if the Republicans lose in '08, building on the base of support he's putting together in Iowa this cycle. He himself had an extended discussion of Huckabee the other day, presumably because he seems like the candidate in the race most amenable to the Sam's Club conservatism approach.

I think my view is that for this to have a shot, not only would Republicans need to lose, but the basic post-1980 strategy of conservative governance would need to fail. During the Clinton years, the Republicans were effectively able to first block efforts at structural change, and then basically govern secure in the knowledge that the administration wouldn't attempt any such efforts. So we got eight years of good government, plus the painstaking restoration of budgetary balance, all in time for Bush to give away the store to big business in an even more intense way that Reagan ever did. Mere defeat in 2008 wouldn't necessary invalidate this strategy.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

'Plug In Better': A Manifesto How to Plug In Better
Rick Santorum Wants Your Sex Life to Be 'Special' Rick Santorum Wants Your Sex Life to Be 'Special'
Mutts Mobilize in Midtown Against Mitt Mutts Mobilize in Midtown Against Mitt
Love Stinks: An Economic Manifesto Love (on the Internet) Stinks
Adulthood, Delayed: What Has the Recession Done to Millennials? Adulthood, Delayed: What's the Recession Done to Millennials?

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
Beyond the BRICs Reuters Beyond the BRICs
A look at the next big global economies—and the rise of a global middle class. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)