Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Cognitive Dissonance

By Matthew Yglesias
Jun 10 2007, 11:11 AM ET Comment

Truly odd Gallup poll result. The question: "Next, we'd like to ask about your views on two different explanations for the origin and development of life on earth. Do you think [see below] is definitely true, probably true, probably false, or definitely false?" They rotated two different answers into the blank space. One was "Evolution -- that is, the idea that human beings developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life." The other was "Creationism -- that is, the idea that God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years."

In the Evolution sample, 18 percent said evolution is definitely true, and an additional 35 percent said it's probably true. In the Creationism sample, however, 39 percent said creationism is definitely true and 27 percent said creationism is probably true.

We've all heard of "framing effects" in polls, and that's what you're seeing here -- people seem inclined to agree with the questioner -- but the scale of the effect seems enormous here, especially since the question isn't particularly obscure.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The Edwards Trial: A Bad Idea From Before the Start The Edwards Trial: A Massive Waste of Time
For the St. Louis Art Museum, a Legal Victory Raises Ethical Questions St. Louis Museum's Legal Victory Raises Ethical Questions
The Pathbreaking Flight of SpaceX's Dragon Capsule, by the Numbers SpaceX Dragon's Pathbreaking Flight, by the Numbers
Visit Afghanistan's 'Little America,' and See the Folly of For-Profit War The Folly of For-Profit War
What Happens When They Get Drones? What Happens When They Get Drones?

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Afghanistan: May 2012

Jun 1, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)