|
|
« Previous Politics | Next Politics » |
|
Pew on Ideology
ByIn Edwards' case I can at least think of plausible reasons people might make this mistake, but if they're making it about Obama as well it's clear that these numbers are being primarily driven by the public's deep, deep ignorance. Two upshots. One is that it's good news for Edwards to see evidentiary backing for the theory that he can stake out the most progressive issue profile and still maintain an image as a moderate. The other is that this is both terrible news for Clinton (as I wrote with Sam it would be crazy for liberals to choose the least-liberal available nominee when she's also seen as the most liberal choice) and also seems to call into question the "unquestioned brilliance" of Mark Penn. His strategy has been for Clinton to stake out an increasingly conservative issue profile to win the general election. It seems, however, that issue profiles don't do much to alter perceptions of public figures. If they do effect anyone, however, it's going to be the sort of high-information political junkies who are disproportionately likely to be primary-voting liberals who Clinton is managing to alienate in droves.





























Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus