More good stuff
from Mark Schmitt on the Mark Penn issue. Schmitt makes the point that Penn combines his multitudinous conflicts of interest with a methodology that leaves him very free to come up with whatever result he wants to find: "Penn's choice of categories has little to do with the actual data and everything to do with his presumptions going in -- populism doesn't work, don't criticize corporations -- which in turn have a delightfully precise correspondence with the interests of the clients of the firm of which Penn is Worldwide President and CEO."
To bring this back to the
point I made yesterday, I think the thing to remember here is that Hillary Clinton isn't a political naif and Penn's basic notion of the shape of American politics doesn't change year-to-year. One would only give him such a large role in one's campaign if one
already wanted to run and govern in the sort of way that Penn would predictably suggest.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus