Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Antifeminists and Islamic Women

By Matthew Yglesias
May 16 2007, 9:01 AM ET Comment

J. Goodrich offers up a bit more on Christina Hoff Sommers' baseless accusations that American feminists don't care about Islamic women:

Sommers is a a very fascinating example of someone who has not herself written a long book about the situation of women in Islamic countries. She found it more important to write books intended at destroying feminism so that there would then be nobody at all to help those women.


Here's even more from Garance Franke-Ruta. I'll also note for the record that when I took a women's studies class in college, the professor -- about as much of an out-of-touch academic cultural theorist as you'll ever find -- Afsaneh Najmabadi was an Iranian woman who, not surprisingly, had noted that Islamist regimes tend to implement woman-unfriendly policies. But, of course, this still came down to the fact that one can't straightforwardly read conclusions like "we should bomb Iran" or "we should sanction Syria" or "we should back an Ethiopian effort to overthrow the de facto government of Somalia" off the reality that "many women in Muslim countries are treated poorly." The alternative proffered by professional anti-feminists like Sommers -- that American feminists should blindly back Republican Party foreign policy -- isn't even a remotely serious effort to grapple with the legitimately difficult question of how people in the west can engage constructively with these issues.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Why We Keep Talking About the Holocaust What Does It Mean to Be Jewish Now?
No, Jon Stewart, Opting Out of Health-Care Mandates Won't Destroy Society Don't Fret Health-Care Mandate Opt-Outs
Tiger Woods Should See a Psychiatrist Tiger Should See a Psychiatrist
'Plug In Better': A Manifesto How to Plug In Better
Memo to the Tea Party: Rick Santorum Rejects Your Message Rick Santorum: The Anti-Tea Party Candidate

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Next Global Economies Reuters The Next Global Economies
Lessons from the BRICs — and a look at which developing countries are on the rise. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)