Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Of Chickens and Hawks

By Matthew Yglesias
Nov 22 2006, 2:44 PM ET Comment

I think Kevin Drum is misconstruing the force of the point Lawrence O'Donnel is making here. Kevin's right to say it doesn't make sense to say that only veterans are allowed to have opinions about questions of war and peace (democracy and all that) or that only veterans are allowed to favor military deployments (since most people aren't veterans, this would just mean the military could never be deployed), but I don't think that's what's at issue here. There are two different sound points in the chickenhawk neighborhood.

One is just that it's a way of calling bullshit on people's insistence that doing this or that is vitally necessary to the security of the country and the world. If you say "The war in Iraq is going downhill, but it's not hopeless yet and it's vitally important for America to succeed -- failure is not an option" I think it's fair to ask in response why you're not putting any skin in the game. Are you volunteering? Encouraging your son, daughter, or little brother to volunteer? The interns working in your office? The college students you might be invited to address on this or that topic? If you're not doing any of those things -- if you don't think you could look a 20 year-old kid you care about in the eyes and tell him with a straight face that it's vitally important for the world that he sign up to fight -- that seems like a good indication that you don't really believe the things you claim to believe. As with any hypocrisy gambit, the reverse might be true -- you might just lack the courage of your convictions rather than lacking conviction -- but it seems likely to me that you're probably just fronting convictions you haven't really thought-through.

The other thing is just the annoying rhetoric of strength, courage, and toughness. Actually punching some dude who hassles you on the street is genuinely tougher and braver (though possibly also dumber) than trying to back down and de-escalate the situation. Advocating that someone else punch some dude who hassles you on the street is not. It's just an opinion. Maybe a right one, maybe a wrong one, but no braver, tougher, stronger, or more courageous than giving the reverse advice. Similarly, volunteering to fight "Islamofascism" in Iraq requires significantly more toughness than does writing blog posts about how troops should be withdrawn. But blogging about how more troops should be sent to fight "Islamofascism" in Iraq isn't a tougher, braver thing to do than is blogging the reverse.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The 10 bEST and 10 Worst States for High-Tech Business The 10 Best and 10 Worst States for High-Tech Business
We Don't Need a Digital sabbath, We Need More Time You Don't Need a Break From Technology
The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet
Our Aging Prison Population: Should Criminals Die Free? Should Aging Prisoners Die Free?
Politics Q&A: Senator Rand Paul Rand Paul: 'You Don't Go Into Politics Unless You Want to Win'

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
A 150th-anniversary commemorative issue, with Atlantic work by Mark Twain, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Frederick Douglass, and others. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)