Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

Casino Royale

By Matthew Yglesias
Nov 25 2006, 11:51 AM ET Comment

Hey, good job reviving your franchise! I kept reading that this was a "grittier" James Bond, but I didn't really see that. They gave us a more human scale Bond than recent films had offered and, most importantly of all, made it genuinely sexy instead of all fake-sexy. They also kept up a reasonably coherent story where you were actually interested to see what happened. That said, the central poker game narrative didn't really make sense to me.

In a minor way, good for Bond for hitting that straight flush, but why did he see the flop at all holding a seven and eight of spades or whatever the hell he had? Beyond quibbling, as best I understood the caper, it wasn't actually necessary for Bond to win the tournament, MI-6's priority was just to make Le Chiffre lose. And around the table, you had not only Bond, but also a friend from Langley along with sundry other characters. It seems like it would be much easier to have Bond and the CIA guy consipre with a third party to help the third party win. And for that matter, why the poker gambit at all? Why not just capture Le Chiffre when they knew where he was going to be? I mean, that's the kind of thing you get, I guess, but that kind of thing bothers me. Just a throwaway line from M about "our relationship with Bulgaria is very sensitive at the moment, and we can't afford another incident" or whatever could have pseudo-explained this away.
Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Tiger Woods Should See a Psychiatrist Tiger Should See a Psychiatrist
Our Aging Prison Population: Should Criminals Die Free? Should Aging Prisoners Die Free?
The Many Questions Surrounding Walmart's 'Great for You' Initiative Does Walmart Really Want What's Great For You?
The 10 bEST and 10 Worst States for High-Tech Business The 10 Best and 10 Worst States for High-Tech Business
Beating History: Why Today's Rising Powers Can't Copy the West Why Today's Rising Economies Can't Copy the West

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)