Skip Navigation
Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias - Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
More

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. His first book, with the working title Heads in the Sand: Iraq and the Strange Death of Liberal Internationalism, scheduled to be published next spring by John Wiley and co., deals with the Democratic Party's struggle to find a post-9/11 foreign policy, focusing primarily on the rise and (hopefully) fall of the liberal hawk movement.

Previously, he was a staff writer at The American Prospect and an Associate Editor at TPM Media, where he contributed to the group blogs Tapped and TPMCafe. His main blog, now at The Atlantic, has existed in various forms since the dark ages of the blogosphere in January 2002.

His writing has appeared in The Guardian, Slate, The New Republic, and The Washington Monthly, and he is a regular on BloggingHeads.tv and makes the occasional radio or television appearance.

Desperately out of touch with the American mainstream, Yglesias was born and raised in Manhattan and studied philosophy at Harvard where he was editor in chief of The Harvard Independent, a campus alternative weekly.

His latest writings can be found on the Matthew Yglesias blog.

A Rare Anti-Partisanship Post

By Matthew Yglesias
Sep 16 2006, 12:59 PM ET Comment

Normally, I'm all for partisanship. There are, however, exceptions. The Washington Post's editorial about the District of Columbia's general election in November reminds us, for example, that there actually will be a general election in November. The outcome, however, isn't actually in doubt -- in this town, the Democratic primary just is the de facto election. As far as I can tell, there's no good reason to run a city with such a lopsided partisan balance this way. It would be much better to run non-partisan elections in two rounds. For the first round, anyone who got a certain number of signatures or whatever would be on the ballot. Then, if nobody got a majority, you'd have a runoff between the top two vote-getters in November.

That's not a perfect system (indeed, there is no system) but under the normally prevailing circumstances, it would be most likely to generate a reasonable outcome. The current system where you can win a Democratic primary with a plurality, and then enjoy a walkover victory in the general election, allows people to get elected mayor on the basis of what's potentially an extremely narrow base of support and means that whatever proportion of the DC electorate isn't registered as a Democrat gets essentially no voice in the governance of the city. Meanwhile, at this point very few major America cities (I think New York is the other big exception) still run partisan elections for local offices, so it's not like I'm putting some crazy notion forward here.

UPDATE: Some commenters are doubting my contention that New York and DC are exceptional in this regard. According to this article:

In more than 80 percent of the nation’s largest cities, mayors are elected through nonpartisan elections – elections in which the candidates do not run on the Democratic or Republican or any other established party line, but as individuals. The cities where there are non-partisan elections include Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Detroit, Denver, and San Francisco. New York City is the exception.


Boston, Philadelphia, New York, and DC, however, all have partisan elections which makes it seem like this is primarily a regional issue with the Northeastern cities generally having partisan elections and cities outside the Northeast generally opting for the non-partisan route.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Aretha Franklin's Platinum Year Aretha Franklin's Platinum Year
The End of Serena Williams The End of Serena Williams
The Edwards Trial: A Bad Idea From Before the Start The Edwards Trial: A Massive Waste of Time
The Fraught Mobile Politics of the United States of Amercia [Sic] The Fraught Mobile Politics of Amercia [Sic]
Sex Selection in America: Why It Persists and How We Can Change It The Right Way to Fight Sex Selection

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Afghanistan: May 2012

Jun 1, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)