![]()
Round Two - August 18, 1999 Scott Stossel says he would welcome a new "Gen X" coalition or party but adds, "I just don' t see it happening." Unfortunately, I agree completely with Scott. Ours is a two-party system. Period. Creating a third (and fourth and fifth) viable political party would revolutionize and energize the political process, but it is hard to envision such a change given our laws and the informal structures of political financing that support the Republican and Democratic parties.
In the past decade, the Reform Party movement has proven that a constituency for a third party exists, but that the infrastructure does not. I agree with Ted Halstead that America's two political parties are often trying to appeal to the same core constituency. Given America's changing racial and cultural composition, we need more room for dissent, debate, and ultimately synthesis on important national issues. Right now, America is about 75 percent non-Hispanic white. In just fifty years America will be only 50 percent white, and half of the population will be black, Latino, Asian, and Native American. Most non-white groups, including Asian-Americans, have not been able to influence the political system in proportion to their numbers in American society. It is an absolute disgrace that the U.S. Senate has just three non-white members. No, I don't think that only black Americans can represent my interests. But I sure am angry that there are no black Senators on Capitol Hill, despite the fact that we are 13 percent of the U.S. population. America has reacted with ignorant disgust to many ideas about broadening the political spectrum. Lani Guinier was run out of Washington on a rail for even suggesting alternative forms of democracy practiced by some of our closest allies, including Israel. I believe Generation X could benefit tremendously by the growth of a third (and fourth and fifth) party. Young Minnesotans were captivated by Jesse Ventura' s candidacy, and helped make him Governor. (How well he is governing is another question.) Young Americans want alternatives. Tucker Carlson seems to see us as a bunch of whiners, and to a certain degree that's true. But I believe most young Americans are not simply crying wolf when they say they are disenfranchised from the political system. One reason young Americans are disenfranchised is money. Young Americans, even those who will earn high sums in the future, usually have very little money to throw into the political ring. They can't schmooze with the candidates at high-level fundraisers; they don't, for the most part, play a critical role in the preseason fund-raising that determines which candidates are viable. The people with the most money are the people with a lifetime of earnings and savings, mature working Americans and seniors. If you believe money influences politics -- and why would individuals and corporations donate hundreds of millions of dollars if it does not? -- then young Americans are ill-equipped to make their voices heard. Join the debate in Post & Riposte. We'll highlight selected readers' remarks as the Roundtable progresses.
Copyright © 1999 by The Atlantic Monthly Company. All rights reserved. |