On this same theme, I mentioned recently a reader's experience when his son, who has Type 1 diabetes and wears an insulin pump, encountered the TSA's new "enhanced pat-down" procedures. Since then I've heard from a variety of people about similar experiences. Here are two. First, a woman based in the South writes:
>>Thanks for drawing attention to the fact that the new TSA pat-downs are more than just a hassle for those of us who depend on medical devices and travel frequently. I've lived with Type 1 diabetes for most of my life and wear a wireless insulin pump. After experiencing the new pat-down, I talked with TSA supervisors at the Atlanta airport about the situation.Second, a male business traveler writes, with emphasis in the original:
Long story short, since my medical device cannot be removed, there is no alternative to these pat-downs when the new scanners are in use - I have to tell the screener that I have a medical exemption and submit to being touched by a stranger in ways that quite frankly I wouldn't allow anyone else to do before the third date. I also have to waste a minimum of ten minutes being groped and watch all of my carry-on luggage checked for explosives.
It seems to me like there's the potential for a discrimination case here. The TSA is singling out an entire class of people based on our medical conditions and treating us like we're criminals. They have NO plans for ways to deal with this (eg, setting up a pre-approval system or using doctor notifications to clear us without the groping).<<
>>I'm a Type 1 diabetic, and I wear an insulin pump. Though the TSA agents routinely claim that most pumps do not set off the alarm, my pump has set off the metal detector every single time I've flown since I've gone on the pump. I refer to the ensuing pat-down as my 'freedom search'. Insulin pumps are not approved by the FDA to go through the X-ray machine. Taking it off is not an option. In my mind, this is a good thing. My insulin pump is a life-critical organ, and I refuse to hand control of it over to anyone else... Though it's fine to be disconnected for short periods, I am sure there are situations where they wouldn't want to give it back right away--and not reconnecting in a short time frame is life threatening for a Type 1. In fact, I wonder if the pump manufacturers recommend against exposing the pump to X-Ray machines specifically to avoid loss of control to security personnel....
I flew last weekend, and I ended up going through the full body backscatter detector in both directions. On the way out, for the very first time since I've been on the pump, I did not get a freedom search. I was ecstatic. I made the agent double check when she told me to move along after going through the detector because the process has become part of my flying routine. I thought that finally, since they could see absolutely everything in this privacy invading scanner there was no longer a need for the farce of a pat-down. (They almost never even really check out the pump to make sure it's legitimate--even though that's the only thing setting of the alarm).
Sadly, on the return flight, even though I demanded to go through the back scatter machine (which thoroughly confused the agents--since most everyone was trying to avoid them), I got a pat down. All my hopes of breezing through security like a normal person flew out the window. I'm still disappointed. I thought: "at least if they can see my junk they don't have to go through with this ridiculous farce anymore."
What really gets me about this is the inconsistency of it: if my insulin pump is truly a threat that can't be fully analyzed by this kind of scanner--then why on earth did they let me through on the originating flight? Two completely separate security protocols were employed for the exact same situation just days apart. I'm fine with the conceit of invading my privacy, wasting my time, and wasting my tax dollars if we all at least pretend it's for security.
This is not even security theater--it's just madness.<<
This article available online at: