Fixing Healthcare, Part Two: The Path to a New Healthcare System

The goals of reform are clear: provide universal care that is affordable.  So far, however, Congress has avoided any proposals that would require a major organizational shake-up--tabling Senators Wyden (D-OR) and Bennett's (R-UT) "Healthy Americans Act" ("Wyden-Bennett"), because it would eliminate employer-based healthcare as we now know it. 


(Senator Wyden/

Conceptually, the most obvious way to achieve universal care without eliminating existing employer policies is through a voucher--plus an exchange where the voucher can be traded in.  Employers would be free to top up the voucher and provide a more generous plan if they wanted to. 


Most of the proposals on the table can be described as providing some sort of voucher.  Massachusetts in effect gives vouchers to the needy.  Wyden-Bennett also provides subsidies that can be reframed as voucher.  But most of the proposals lack the clarity of a straightforward voucher framework.  Vouchers provide a simple analytical framework for expanding care, for defining public assistance, and for deciding how much we want to spend.  Moreover, by defining the amount of care we can afford, vouchers provide incentives for providers to improve efficiency in order to provide care within those limits, and provide a clear framework for evaluating cost and funding of universal healthcare.  Vouchers do not require a "public option."  Vouchers need not be universal, although some sort of offset for employer plans would be required if we want employers to maintain the incentive to provide their own plans. 


A voucher system, combined with an overhaul of the regulatory and liability system, would dramatically shift the incentives towards a more effective system of healthcare delivery.  Thus:


1.    Transition into a voucher system. The most effective way of driving providers towards a new model of delivery is to transition all public assistance (starting with Medicaid) into the voucher program.  This will put enormous pressure on insurers and providers to shift to a capitated system.  Set up a federal authority to evaluate providers annually and help define baseline care.  If we're going to have socialized healthcare for any significant part of the population (government already pays for half of all healthcare), there is no way to avoid government oversight.  The challenge is to create authority structures that are transparent and accountable.  


2.    Overhaul regulatory and liability structures so that providers can focus on care, not compliance and defensive medicine.  Congress should require special health courts with the goal of reliability. (Wyden-Bennett provides bonuses to states that implement liability reform.)  Congress should establish a medical version of a base-closing commission to propose a rationalization of federal and state regulation, including easing antitrust restrictions so that, for example, providers can share expensive diagnostic equipment.


Insurers and providers must be required to reorganize themselves to provide care for an annual fixed fee, adjusted for performance.  But they must be given the freedom to figure out how to innovate towards this end--subject always to oversight and accountability for good results.  Top-down dictates can never work.  A voucher system will put enormous pressure on them to become efficient.  A reliable legal and regulatory system will give them room to innovate.  And a new regulatory authority will make sure they provide competent care.   


Healthcare reform ultimately requires a proposal that everyone understands.  It's too easy now to blow smoke over any proposal.  Universal care can be accomplished through vouchers.  Cleaning out the legal jungle will create room for innovation and productivity.  People can understand these principles for change.  That gives them a chance of actually happening.

(For Part One)

Presented by

Philip K. Howard is a lawyer and author, and the chair of Common Good. He most recent book is The Rule of Nobody.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in National

From This Author

Just In