Fixing Healthcare, Part Two: The Path to a New Healthcare System

More

The goals of reform are clear: provide universal care that is affordable.  So far, however, Congress has avoided any proposals that would require a major organizational shake-up--tabling Senators Wyden (D-OR) and Bennett's (R-UT) "Healthy Americans Act" ("Wyden-Bennett"), because it would eliminate employer-based healthcare as we now know it. 


wyden.JPG

(Senator Wyden/http://www.flickr.com/photos/pirateyjoe/3642123174)


Conceptually, the most obvious way to achieve universal care without eliminating existing employer policies is through a voucher--plus an exchange where the voucher can be traded in.  Employers would be free to top up the voucher and provide a more generous plan if they wanted to. 

 

Most of the proposals on the table can be described as providing some sort of voucher.  Massachusetts in effect gives vouchers to the needy.  Wyden-Bennett also provides subsidies that can be reframed as voucher.  But most of the proposals lack the clarity of a straightforward voucher framework.  Vouchers provide a simple analytical framework for expanding care, for defining public assistance, and for deciding how much we want to spend.  Moreover, by defining the amount of care we can afford, vouchers provide incentives for providers to improve efficiency in order to provide care within those limits, and provide a clear framework for evaluating cost and funding of universal healthcare.  Vouchers do not require a "public option."  Vouchers need not be universal, although some sort of offset for employer plans would be required if we want employers to maintain the incentive to provide their own plans. 

 

A voucher system, combined with an overhaul of the regulatory and liability system, would dramatically shift the incentives towards a more effective system of healthcare delivery.  Thus:

 

1.    Transition into a voucher system. The most effective way of driving providers towards a new model of delivery is to transition all public assistance (starting with Medicaid) into the voucher program.  This will put enormous pressure on insurers and providers to shift to a capitated system.  Set up a federal authority to evaluate providers annually and help define baseline care.  If we're going to have socialized healthcare for any significant part of the population (government already pays for half of all healthcare), there is no way to avoid government oversight.  The challenge is to create authority structures that are transparent and accountable.  

 

2.    Overhaul regulatory and liability structures so that providers can focus on care, not compliance and defensive medicine.  Congress should require special health courts with the goal of reliability. (Wyden-Bennett provides bonuses to states that implement liability reform.)  Congress should establish a medical version of a base-closing commission to propose a rationalization of federal and state regulation, including easing antitrust restrictions so that, for example, providers can share expensive diagnostic equipment.

 

Insurers and providers must be required to reorganize themselves to provide care for an annual fixed fee, adjusted for performance.  But they must be given the freedom to figure out how to innovate towards this end--subject always to oversight and accountability for good results.  Top-down dictates can never work.  A voucher system will put enormous pressure on them to become efficient.  A reliable legal and regulatory system will give them room to innovate.  And a new regulatory authority will make sure they provide competent care.   

 

Healthcare reform ultimately requires a proposal that everyone understands.  It's too easy now to blow smoke over any proposal.  Universal care can be accomplished through vouchers.  Cleaning out the legal jungle will create room for innovation and productivity.  People can understand these principles for change.  That gives them a chance of actually happening.


(For Part One)

Jump to comments
Presented by

Philip K. Howard is a lawyer, author and chair of Common Good. He is the author, most recently, of Life Without Lawyers: Restoring Responsibility in America, and wrote the introduction to Al Gore's Common Sense Government. More

Philip K. Howard is the author of Life Without Lawyers(Norton 2009), as well as the best-seller The Death of Common Sense(Random House, 1995) and The Collapse of the Common Good(Ballantine, 2002), and he is a periodic contributor to the op-ed pages of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. He advises leaders of both parties on legal and regulatory reform issues, and wrote the introduction to Vice President Al Gore's book Common Sense Government. A practicing lawyer, Howard is a partner in the law firm Covington & Burling LLP. In 2002, Howard founded Common Good (www.commongood.org), organized to restore common sense to American public life. The Advisory Board of Common Good is composed of leaders from a broad cross-section of American political thought including, among others, former Senators Howard Baker, Bill Bradley, George McGovern, and Alan Simpson. Howard is a civic leader in New York and is Chair-Emeritus of the Municipal Art Society, a leading civic group that spearheaded initiatives to preserve Grand Central Terminal.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Why Are Americans So Bad at Saving Money?

The US is particularly miserable at putting aside money for the future. Should we blame our paychecks or our psychology?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.

Video

How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe

Video

A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.

Video

I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."

Video

Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion

Writers

Up
Down

More in National

From This Author

Just In