Should kids know their own IQs?

It is a universal and unnerving question for any parent: Should you tell your child his or her IQ score?

But I suggest that we are all asking the wrong question. 

That's because we've been living under a false assumption. We've been led to believe that IQ scores reveal our innate intelligence -- our inborn potential and limits. Believing that, the notion of telling a child his or her score is indeed terrifying. It is, in essence saying: here's what you are capable of, and what you are not capable of. Under that understanding of IQ, knowing one's score (whatever the number) can be a severe burden.

But according to a number of intelligence experts -- not all, mind you, but the ones I have come to trust most after three years of research on the subject -- IQ does not reveal one's innate intelligence. Rather, IQ tests reveal what many other tests reveal: developed skills. 

That's not to say that IQ tests are useless. They can be very useful for school administrators to see how their students are faring compared to other schools. They can confirm or refute hunches that parents and teachers might have about specific strengths or weaknesses in certain individuals.

But IQ is not an omniscient window into your brain core. 

According to this new understanding, the question should not be whether to tell your child his or her IQ. The question should be: What should you tell your child about IQ?

Here's our chance to destigmatize IQ and intelligence, once and for all. Here's our chance to help our children understand that the human brain is marvelously plastic, and full of extraordinary potential -- if we figure out how to tap into it. 

Rather than treating IQ like a inflexible truth, our conversations with our children can put IQ in its proper place. Grades show us how we are doing in class so far. IQ and other tests show us how our intellectual skills are developing so far. 

Every skill measured by the IQ test can be improved -- if we understand that intelligence is a process and not a thing. Stanford's Carol Dweck has demonstrated powerfully that students who view intelligence as skills-in-progress do much better than students who consider intelligence a fixed quantity. 
IQ scores need not be something to fear, or hide from. Like any other test, they can be an opportunity to see how far we've come, and how far we have to go.
Presented by

David Shenk is a writer on genetics, talent and intelligence. He is the author of Data Smog, The Forgetting, and most recently, The Genius In All of Us. More

David Shenk is the author of six books, including Data Smog ("indispensable"—The New York Times), The Immortal Game ("superb"—The Wall Street Journal), and the bestselling The Forgetting ("a remarkable addition to the literature of the science of the mind."—The Los Angeles Times ). He has contributed to National Geographic, Slate, The New York Times, Gourmet, Harper's, The New Yorker, The American Scholar, and National Public Radio. Shenk's work inspired the Emmy-award winning PBS documentary The Forgetting and was featured in the Oscar-nominated feature Away From Her. His latest book, The Genius In All Of Us, was published in March 2010. Shenk has advised the President's Council on Bioethics and is a popular speaker. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Cryotherapy's Dubious Appeal

James Hamblin tries a questionable medical treatment.


Confessions of Moms Around the World

In Europe, mothers get maternity leave, discounted daycare, and flexible working hours.


How Do Trees Know When It's Spring?

The science behind beautiful seasonal blooming

More in National

From This Author

Just In