|
|
|
Dowd opened with one of her trademark gum-snappers—"Hillary is not David Geffen's dreamgirl"—and dished on richly from there. "Obama is inspirational," Geffen told Dowd, "and he's not from the Bush royal family or the Clinton royal family. Americans are dying every day in Iraq. And I'm tired of hearing James Carville on television."
The Clintons, he said, are "unwilling to stand for the things that they genuinely believe in. Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it's troubling."
It was exactly what '08 campaign types—on both sides of the notebook—needed, as all players immediately recognized. The next day, the news migrated to the front of The Times in a story that began, "The sun was not yet up yesterday, and members of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign team were confronted with the kind of attack that most infuriates them: one questioning the character of Mrs. Clinton and her husband." A Clinton spokesman demanded that Obama cut his ties to the mogul and return campaign donations that Geffen helped raise.
The following day brought another front-pager, reporting that "Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has drawn Mr. Obama onto a muddy political field, engaging him in a back-and-forth that recalls the kind of Washington bickering Mr. Obama has decried." Obama, the story said, "seemed to acknowledge that he may have been outmaneuvered."
The tentative verbs ("seemed," "may have been") lent the story a floaty, not-quite-real quality, while "outmaneuvered" reminded us we are watching a game that has only just begun. Your move, Obama, it said. Far from wounding Obama, the story kept him in the limelight and served as a reminder that he has not lost momentum. Everyone (Geffen, Hillary, Obama, The Times) got a piece of the action.
Beyond that, there wasn't a lot to the spat—David hates Hillary, Hillary hates Obama, nyah, nyah, nyah. But it was covered in hundreds of news stories and columns around the world. For a few days, the controversy was the beating heart of the '08 campaign coverage. One man in a mansion before a crackling fire.
There will be many more of these stories. They are the Twinkies of political news—light, synthetic, tasty, and strangely unfilling. Some have more to tell us than others. Geffen's comments tapped a real vein of unease within the Democratic Party about the Clintons. It was more substantial than, say, Obama in the surf. But then, what isn't?
Twenty months is a long, long time.
David H. Freedman on smartphone apps and the perfected self, Mark Bowden on being in the dumb kids' class, James Parker on Glenn Beck, Isaac Chotiner on P. G. Wodehouse, and more
Browse back issues of The Atlantic that have appeared on the Web. From September 1995 to the present, the archive is essentially complete, with the exception of a few articles, the online rights to which are held exclusively by the authors.
See All Back Issues: September 1995
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus