ON August 18, 1587, Virginia Dare became the first child born to English
parents in the New World. Her birthplace—on Roanoke Island, in what is
now North Carolina—was Britain's first attempt at colonizing this
continent, and was the site of the first recorded British murder of an
Indian chief. Though Dare's band of settlers did not survive intact,
Roanoke Island was the beginning of the historical process in which
English-speaking Europeans settled and subdued North America over the next
four centuries.
On September 14, 1987, 400 years later, a team of biologists from the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service office on Roanoke Island opened the gate of a
pen and released a pair of red wolves wearing radio collars into the
Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge. The animals disappeared into the
woods perhaps half an hour's drive from the spot where Dare was born.
Their species was the first ever to go extinct in the North American wild
and then be reintroduced into the natural world from a remnant population
in zoos. They were, as surely as Dare, pioneers.
The forces set in motion by European colonization had all but erased red
wolves from the continent: settlers made wolves a symbol of the devil,
placed bounties on their heads, organized state and federal predator
control programs, and farmed and developed their last few strongholds. The
Roanoke Island biologists have watched and listened for the past eight
years as the animals they released have reproduced and spread across the
refuge's swampy, mosquito-infested 150,000 acres. As of this winter the
biologists had counted sixty-one wild-born puppies. One wild-born female
had borne four litters, and one of her pups had in turn given birth; a
third generation of wild red wolves was howling in the night.
BACK TO NATURE
FIVE hundred miles to the north, from his home on Nantucket, Peter
Dunwiddie, a plant ecologist, studies core samples of swamps and bogs,
looking at pollen under a microscope to figure out what was growing on
Cape Cod and the neighboring Atlantic islands in the time before and after
the Pilgrims debarked in nearby Plymouth. It's easy to spot the onset of
European settlement in his pollen samples. "Literally in a matter of
decades," he told me recently, "the forest was cleared. There's no more
oak pollen, and all of a sudden lots of grass pollen. That persisted
throughout much of the following couple of hundred years," as Europeans
turned most of the area into a giant sheep pasture.
In the late 1800s, just as the agricultural economy was beginning to
dwindle, local residents started taking photographs. In addition to his
pollen samples, Dunwiddie has gathered a vast library of original pictures
along with ones taken from the same places fifty or a hundred years later.
"Here's Prospect Hill, on Martha's Vineyard, in 1916," he said to me,
choosing one in which a stone wall marched up and over the top of a hill.
"There's not a tree to be seen. The retake of the photo today is entirely
of an oak forest—a mature oak forest. You can't see the stone wall; you
can barely make out the contours of the hill at all, because of the
forest."
The scenario—oak and pitch pine replace pasture—has repeated itself all
over the area. "Sometimes we had to use a ladder and a pole to get the
camera above the treetops just to take a picture," Dunwiddie said. In his
bog cores "the pollen is beginning to resemble the pre-European." Coyotes,
which in the 1970s crossed the Cape Cod canal and established themselves
on the Cape, have recently managed the ocean crossing to the remote
Elizabeth Islands. "They've very quickly decimated the feral sheep that
were left out there," Dunwiddie said. "They're taking quite a toll on the
deer population. The deer and the sheep had been browsing down the
seedlings; there's likely to be a really dramatic spurt of growth."
IMAGINE the view from a satellite, Alan Durning writes in the 1994 edition
of the Worldwatch Institute's State of the World report. A time-lapse film
that showed you a thousand years each minute would reveal only the
slightest changes in the earth's forests, which for millennium after
millennium covered about a third of the planet's land surface. But in the
film's last three seconds, he says—the years after 1950—the change
"accelerates explosively."
Vast tracts of forest vanish from Japan, the Philippines, and the
mainland of Southeast Asia, from most of Central America and the horn of
Africa, from western North America and eastern South America, from the
Indian subcontinent and sub-Saharan Africa. . . . Southeast Asia resembles
a dog with the mange. Malaysian Borneo is scalped. In the final fractions
of a second, the clearing spreads to Siberia and the Canadian north.
Forests disappear so suddenly from so many places that it looks like a
plague of locusts has descended on the planet.
If you stared from space at eastern North America in the same three
seconds, however, you'd see something different: a patch of green
spreading like mold across bread, and spreading fast. In the early
nineteenth century the cleric Timothy Dwight reported that the 240-mile
journey from Boston to New York City passed through no more than twenty
miles of forest. Surveying the changes wrought by farmers and loggers in
New Hampshire, he wrote, "The forests are not only cut down, but there
appears little reason to hope that they will ever grow again."
Less than two centuries later, despite great increases in the state's
population, 90 percent of New Hampshire is covered by forest. Vermont was
35 percent woods in 1850 and is 80 percent today, and even Massachusetts,
Connecticut, and Rhode Island have seen woodlands rebound to the point
where they cover nearly three fifths of southern New England. This
process, which began as farmers abandoned the cold and rocky pastures of
the East for the fertile fields of the Midwest, has not yet run its
course. Forest cover in New York State, for instance, continued to grow by
more than a million acres a decade through 1980. In sum, writes Douglas
MacCleery, of the U.S. Forest Service, "the forest and farmland landscape
of the Appalachians, as well as many other parts of the East and South,
has come full circle. By the 1960s and 1970s, the pattern of forest,
fields, and pastures was similar to that prior to 1800, its appearance
much like it must have been prior to the American Revolution."
This unintentional and mostly unnoticed renewal of the rural and
mountainous East—not the spotted owl, not the salvation of Alaska's
pristine ranges—represents the great environmental story of the United
States, and in some ways of the whole world. Here, where "suburb" and
"megalopolis" were added to the world's vocabulary, an explosion of green
is under way, one that could offer hope to much of the rest of the planet.
The forests, as a recent federal study pointed out, will still take
centuries of care before they recover their original grandeur. And
backsliding is always a danger; the regreening of the East faces many
threats. But it is undeniably real. In his journal Thoreau listed the
species gone from Concord by the middle of the nineteenth century: bear,
moose, deer, porcupine, "'rav'nous howling Wolf,'" and beaver. In 1989
environmental police had to kill a moose that had decided to make its home
on the median strip of Route 128, famous as "America's Technology
Highway." "We've never been faced with a moose ten miles from Boston,"
said one game warden, who donated the animal's carcass to a Salvation Army
soup kitchen.
American heads turn west when the subject of nature comes up. I have
before me the Sierra Club engagement calendar for 1995, with fifty-eight
gorgeous pictures, most of them sweeping western vistas. Precisely two
come from the thousand-mile sweep of the Appalachians—a patch of orchids
in Tennessee and a picture from Maine titled, accurately, "Leaf in
Stream." We are raised on what the writer Jose Knighton calls "eco-porn"-
sunset-tinted photos of the Grand Tetons and other swelling bosoms of the
West. But we might take as our emblem the pine: not towering white pines,
marked by the first lumbermen in North America with a "King's Arrow" to
reserve them for the Royal Navy, but the spindly pine that springs up when
cows leave a pasture, the pine that begins the long process of
reclamation. From the Pisgahs, the Unakas, and the Nantahalas of the
southern Appalachians to the Whites and Greens and Adirondacks of the
North, the woods are coming back, and people are starting to notice. In
the late 1980s Congress called for a study on how to protect the 26
million acres of forest in New York, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine
—forest that in some cases wasn't there a hundred years ago. "Show me
another twenty-six-million-acre chunk," says John Harrigan, a New
Hampshire newspaper editor who sat on the study commission. "Outside of
Seward's Folly, I don't think you can." Yellowstone Park, in contrast,
covers 2.2 million acres.
QUICK DEVASTATION, QUICK RECOVERY
THE story of this recovery begins long before Europeans arrived on these
shores. It is worth remembering that no spot on the globe was originally
more natural or wild than any other: if America had been settled west to
east, we might think of the East Coast as the wild shore, and our
calendars might concentrate on Chesapeake Bay and the Everglades. Over
time the mountains of the East have risen to heights we would consider
western, been eroded, and risen again. The rock on Grandfather Mountain,
rising 4,000 feet above the Piedmont Plain in western North Carolina, is
more than a billion years old, among the oldest on the planet. Along the
Blue Ridge and its surrounding highlands neither glacier nor ocean has
covered the land for hundreds of millions of years; the result is a rare
biological refuge that preserves much of the story of evolution. Plants
could travel slowly north and south along the ridges of the Appalachians
as climates changed, escaping extinction. Thus the Smokies boast more than
1,300 flowering plants and a hundred types of trees. Arguably, the
southern Appalachians form the most diverse temperate forest in the
world.
Farther north the landscape was a mile deep in glacial ice until
comparatively recently—perhaps 11,000 years ago. On the glaciers' retreat
the rock and till were colonized by fungi and lichens that eventually
converted the rock to soil. The soil provided a home for forests that were
spreading northward, but the North has never been especially hospitable.
Though cold fronts from Canada and warm air from the Midwest and the Gulf
bring abundant precipitation, the soils are not deep. Often acidic and
fragile, they make agriculture difficult; the short growing seasons have
favored spruce-fir forests in the colder places and a mixture of maple,
beech, and birch in slightly warmer sections. Nonetheless, about three
quarters of America's original forests were found in the eastern third of
the nation, and today about three quarters of the nation's forests are in
the East.
Very little of the forest is virgin, of course. Most of it is haunted by
the human history that brings time into being—a history that long
pre-dates Columbus. Paleo-Indians moved into the northern forest not long
after the glaciers receded. Scientists continue to debate whether their
arrival caused the sudden dying-off of megafauna—mammoths and mastodons,
armadillos and ground sloths, giant beavers, dire wolves, and saber
toothed tigers—that once roamed the East. There is no question, however,
that over thousands of years Indians rearranged the landscape to suit
their needs. "It is tempting to believe that when the Europeans arrived in
the New World they confronted Virgin Lands, the Forest Primeval, a
wilderness which had existed for eons uninfluenced by human hands,"
William Cronon writes in his masterly account of New England's early
history, Changes in the Land. "Nothing could be further from the truth."
Indians cleared land for agriculture and burnt some forests once or twice
a year, keeping them open and parklike.
The Indian disruptions, though extensive, were usually temporary. When
Indians had used one area for a time, they often moved to another. Not so
Europeans. Early logging was bad enough, but farmers cut down every tree
as they cleared pasture, and then brought in grazing animals that ate the
native grasses down to dirt. New plant species arrived in shipboard
fodder: mulleins and mallows, for instance, and nightshades, stinging
nettles, and dandelions. Other agricultural techniques left their own
devastation. Instead of rotating crops, farmers planted corn year after
year, and corn quickly exhausts soil. Colonial farmers often used fish as
fertilizer—at the end of the eighteenth century, Cronon writes, a dollar
could buy a thousand fish.
This was merely a warm-up, however, for the destruction in the first
century of the new republic. From 1780 to 1850 the population of the
United States grew nearly eightfold, from nearly three million to about 23
million. It took about three acres of cropland to feed each person. For a
while the trees that farmers cleared for fields met the nation's demand
for timber, but in the second half of the nineteenth century lumber
consumption rose from 5.4 billion to 44.5 billion board feet a year.
Wood was used for everything—it was the cornerstone of the economy in the
same way that petroleum is today. What iron existed was smelted using wood
charcoal; to produce a thousand tons of iron a year, a furnace needed
20,000 or 30,000 acres of forest, MacCleery writes. A square forty
acre field required 8,000 fence rails. In the latter half of the
nineteenth century, when barbed wire began to replace wood, there were
more than three million miles of wooden fence in America. Railroads soon
claimed the wood freed up by wire fencing; at the turn of the century the
demand for railroad cars, ties, fuel, bridges, trestles, stations, and
telegraph poles was taking a quarter of the nation's timber production.
Steamboats burned wood for fuel until the Civil War, consuming a fifth of
all the wood sold for fuel in 1840. In the second half of the nineteenth
century forest cover in many areas of the East had fallen from 70 percent
to 25 percent or less. Eventually the profligate cutting left lumbermen
little choice but to move west: there were few mature forests left to
take. Loggers moved from New England to New York, Pennsylvania, the Great
Lakes, and the South.
Something similar was happening in agriculture. Even for those lands that
had not been exhausted by poor farming, improved transportation to the
fertile soils of the Midwest meant insurmountable competition. The opening
of the Erie Canal, in 1835, is as good a starting point as any. In the
decades that followed, the Northeast stopped concentrating on supplying
raw materials and began the long transition to an economy based on
manufacturing and services. For example, the first Merino sheep arrived
near Mount Ascutney, Vermont, in 1809. By 1840 there were 1,681,000 sheep
in the state, or six per person. Thirty years later the number had been
cut in half: the reasons include that western ranches could now ship their
wool by rail and undercut Vermonters. The dairy industry has survived,
milk being harder to transport great distances, but it, too, has long been
in decline.
By 1890, 42 percent of the people who had been born in Vermont lived
elsewhere. It was a Vermont native, Horace Greeley, who said "Go West,
young man"; among those who lit out was another, John Deere, whose
machinery would transform the plains. According to the author Ben Bachman,
Vermont has produced thirty-five U.S. senators, 114 congressmen, and sixty
governors who have served in other states. "Vermont recovered because the
destruction was a one-shot destruction," says Steve Trombulak, a biologist
at Middlebury College. "It was cleared, pastured for maybe twenty or
thirty years, and then everyone discovered Ohio. I don't believe for a
moment that Vermont would look like this if it weren't for the Louisiana
Purchase—if we hadn't found places where you didn't break your plough on
the stones."
If the nineteenth century was an epoch of destruction for the northern
forest, the twentieth century has been a long sleep. If you walk in almost
any woods in the East, you can see the recovery process up close—see the
cellar holes that sprout birch, the careful piles of stone now covered by
moss and surrounded by forest. From the window in the room where I type
these words, I can see the crumbling stone dam that powered the small
Adirondack sawmill that once skimmed the trees from all the surrounding
ridges. Trees gone; sawmill gone. Sawmill gone; trees return.
For me the proof that what is happening is significant—and right and
necessary—lies in the recovery not only of the forests themselves but of
much of the life they always supported. As early as 1672 wild turkeys were
described as rare in Massachusetts. Beaver were disappearing from the
Massachusetts coast as early as 1640 and from the Narragansett region by
1660, as Indians and others filled the demands of the fur-trading posts,
moving farther up the rivers in search of fresh supplies. Massachusetts
had its first closed season on deer in 1694; eventually deer were
eliminated from Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and all but the
northern fringes of the Great Lakes states. In Changes in the Land, Cronon
quotes the nineteenth-century cleric Timothy Dwight: "Hunting with us
exists chiefly in the tales of other times."
But just as the last animals were vanishing, organized sportsmen's groups,
led by Theodore Roosevelt and others, banded together to oppose market
hunting, enact game laws, and establish refuges and reserves. Their
efforts meshed with the slow return of habitat, and animal populations
boomed. Whitetail deer now number more than 18 million—perhaps half as
many as were in the original herd, but forty times as many as existed in
the late 1800s. Pennsylvania motorists alone killed 43,000 deer in 1990;
deer browse so much suburban shrubbery that some homeowners call them
"rats with hooves."
Perhaps 40,000 black bears roam the East. Alligators, placed on the
endangered-species list in 1967, after hunting had nearly wiped them out,
rebounded within ten years to a population of two million. In 1972, thirty
seven wild turkeys were introduced into western Massachusetts—where the
species had long since vanished. By now the population exceeds 10,000.
As game has spread, so have predators. Even in heavily settled
Massachusetts, coyotes—not seen until the 1930s—now live in virtually
every town. Larger predators, too, may be appearing. In rural uplands
throughout the East the part of the imagination that elsewhere is reserved
for Elvis sightings is given over to stories about cougars, panthers,
pumas, mountain lions, and catamounts—all names for the same long-tailed
wild cat. Officially there aren't any. As the final clearing of the region
took place, in the nineteenth century, and as the deer herds that were
their prey vanished, cougars were wiped out across the East.
The Eastern Puma Research Network, however, has received reports of 1,800
puma sightings in the past decade. During hunting season in 1993, for
instance, a Maine hunter heard a sound "like a woman screaming in pain."
Topping a rise, he saw a large tawny animal shaking something in its
mouth. The animal turned toward him, and he saw a "big angry head-
about the size of an average human head." It snarled, dropped its prey,
and disappeared in "three tremendous long leaps." The hunter collected the
carcass of the prey, which turned out to be a bobcat—a smaller feline
that is common in the northern forest. Biologists said that the bite and
claw marks on the bobcat were the right size for a cougar. The sightings
increase each year; the wildness seems to gather. Last fall Vermont
wildlife officials confirmed that they had found scat from at least one
mountain lion.
RECOVERY AND RUINATION
THIS recovery was not automatic. It is an accident of climate, soil, and
economics. Recovery has not come to the Midwest, because the soils there
continue to be valuable for industrial agriculture. Recovery has not come
to the entire East, either—some places are still logged as brutally as
the Pacific Northwest. And even where recovery has progressed farthest, it
will not necessarily be permanent. Stand on top of North Carolina's Mount
Mitchell, at 6,684 feet the tallest mountain in the East (in 1835, when it
was measured, it was the highest point in the then United States), and you
see the twin vistas of recovery and ruination. Clear-cut logging had
spread within half a mile of the summit before it was finally halted, in
1915. Now the forest is protected by the Blue Ridge Parkway and the city
of Asheville's watershed, and so the spruce and fir have grown anew on its
slopes. Near the top, however, low-level ozone and acid rain have left a
dying and skeletal forest, its branches bony and silver. From the
observation deck, signs tell you, you can see "Slick Rock Mountain, a
residential and resort development. The flattened, barren area is the end
of an airport runway." You can see the scars of feldspar mines that
produce much of the world's high-purity quartz for use in making computer
chips, halogen lights, and semiconductors. And you can see the effects of
the burning of coal and oil to power all those chips and lights—a
semipermanent brown layer of haze that obstructs the view to the
distance.
Though the basic physical trends in the East may be toward restoration,
increasingly these are running up against renewed human assaults. To use a
regionally appropriate metaphor, the East is like a young sapling
sprouting from the stump of an old chestnut that was killed off by a
deadly fungus in the early twentieth century. It looks healthy, it seems
full of vigor—but it isn't going to get much bigger before it, too,
succumbs to blight.
Some of the blight is literal. Global trade, which is ever-increasing,
introduces new plant diseases through transported nursery stock, packing
materials, and timber imports. A devastating beech-bark blight is ravaging
trees in the Northeast, while hemlocks across the region are succumbing to
a menacing insect, the woolly adelgid. Still, blights move slowly, at
least by comparison with a feller-buncher—a machine equipped with a
grappling arm that grabs a tree by the trunk and a buzz saw that slices it
off near the ground. The machine symbolizes the industrial forestry that
dominates the southern and northern extremities of the region.
Precious little prime eastern land, even that owned by the federal
government, is protected from clear-cutting and other devastating
"management" techniques. The damage is not new. Steve Trombulak, the
biologist at Middlebury, talks of the many plant and animal species that
have gone extinct in the Northeast, in part because they depended on old
growth forest that vanished long ago. Whatever the eastern equivalents of
spotted owls were, we lost them two centuries ago. "And of course we'll
never know about soil microbes, things like that," Trombulak says. And the
losses are not confined to the past. David Cameron Duffy, who has studied
wildflowers in the southern Appalachians, reported recently that even
ninety years after the forests were last cut, many species have not
returned. The smaller, denser stands of trees that mark a recovering
forest mean changes in soil conditions, temperature, and water
availability. Beyond mere species, a recovering forest lacks the richness
of interactions found in an ancient forest—the relationships between
species big and small which are at the heart of any forest.
For example, a recent study of national forests in western North Carolina
found that catches of salamanders were five times as high in mature stands
as in forests clear-cut less than ten years ago. Because they need to keep
their skin wet to breathe, salamanders generally seek moist microhabitats.
A clear-cut, which leaves an unshaded field, dehydrates the forest floor,
reduces leaf litter, and increases soil temperature. All in all, says
James Petranka, an expert on amphibians at the University of North
Carolina, clear-cutting is killing about 14 million salamanders annually
and "chronically reducing regional populations." When the clear-cut woods
come back, they are no longer what we think of as a forest but an "even
aged" stand, often composed predominantly of one species, and, in the
words of a recent report from the Interior Department, "structurally and
biologically less diverse than natural forests of any age."
The coastal plain of the Southeast has perhaps been the most badly
damaged—the great mature stands of longleaf pine have nearly vanished,
replaced by faster-growing species in vast pulp plantations. The same
attack of industrial forestry has afflicted the Maine woods in recent
years. The ten million acres of the core Maine forest—the largest green
blob on the map of the East—houses virtually no permanent inhabitants.
Loggers go there, and so do some hunters and fishermen who pay the usage
fees required by the enormous timber and paper companies that own almost
the whole spread. People routinely mistake the emptiness for wildness, but
in fact the Maine woods produce huge quantities of pulp for paper, and
export large quantities of raw logs. The cutting has been most Bunyanesque
in the past fifteen years; as companies scrambled to salvage timber that
was threatened by an infestation of spruce budworm, huge clear-cuts spread
across the region.
The damage inflicted on the woods by cutting at such a rate is a sight to
behold. You can behold it only if you happen to be in a small plane,
though, which allows you to peek over the "beauty strips" that protect
watercourses from runoff and also shield the view of what can look like
vast deserts. Rudy Engholm, the New England director of the Environmental
Air Force, a group of ecologically minded private pilots, picked me and a
couple of environmentalists up at a small airport in northern New
Hampshire last summer. We flew across Lake Umbagog and into Maine, flying
for hours over land that knows no human settlement and yet is devastated
in ways inconceivable in many more-densely settled parts of the Northeast.
We could see the occasional moose standing on a logging road, but mostly
the view was of clear-cuts—tracts sometimes thousands of acres in size on
which almost every tree was gone. Other spots had been spared
clear-cutting but had been "high-graded" so relentlessly, with every big
tree removed, that the land looked as if it had mange. Many huge patches
had been sprayed from the air with herbicides to keep down "undesirable"
hardwoods and produce more fir and spruce, which are the woods easiest to
use for paper; in the middle of summer the leaves of the dying trees were
awash with the colors of autumn. The Allagash Wilderness Waterway was
instantly recognizable along much of its length by the line of trees a few
hundred feet wide that ran along each side of it. From a canoe in the
river you would think you were in the wilderness, but if you walked a
quarter mile to pee you might find yourself staring out across a plain
nearly devoid of life. In recent years new legislation has limited the
size of clear-cuts. In some cases this has led to more partial cutting; in
other spots strange geometric figures are now cut from the forest—huge
assemblages of clear-cuts separated by narrow "wildlife corridors" that
may lead nowhere.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus