

|
Behind the Scenes -- February 1996
An Interview with Bill Berkeley
Could you fill us in on what you've done since you wrote "The Warlords of
Natal" for The Atlantic in March, 1994?
I had an Alicia Patterson fellowship all last year. I spent a year reporting on
ethnic conflict in Africa. I spent a year in east and southern Africa. I made a
number of trips to Rwanda, during and after the genocide there. I reported from
Uganda, Sudan, Ethiopia, Kenya, and South Africa. I am writing a book about
ethnic conflict in Africa.
How did you develop your interest in Africa?
Twelve years ago I got interested primarily in South Africa, for obvious
reasons: big story, big drama, big racial melodrama. From a logistical point of
view, I had trouble getting into South Africa. I ended up in black Africa
instead and got hooked, got addicted. You know what they say about Sudan: once
you've drunk from the waters of the White Nile, you're infected for life. I
found that what was going on in Africa was extremely compelling and
fascinating. Also, as a journalist I've tended to be at my best and most
comfortable off the beaten track. I like being in border towns. Black Africa is
sort of like powder skiing in that regard: you're the only one there, it's all
virgin territory. These are huge issues--issues of war and peace, good and
evil. There are great historical dramas unfolding with all different eras of
history taking place simultaneously. Biblical famines, feudal politics, cold
war intrigue, communism, capitalism, Stalinism, Islam--all going on at once.
I've also had a particular interest in history and Africa is the part of the
world where history is unfolding. I like telling people about stuff they don't
know anything about.
Have you had close calls in Africa?
From time to time. I wouldn't want to exaggerate them though. Nothing that's
happened to me compares to what happens to Africans all the time. But there
have been some problematical episodes. I've been arrested a couple of times.
I've received death threats. Ironically and unfairly, white people have
protections in Africa that Africans themselves don't have--mainly because even
the most thuggish official or police officer can make the elementary
calculation that if something happens to a foreigner he might be held
accountable for it, whereas if something happens to a fellow African no one
will ever hear about it. But, yes, my wife and I were arrested in Zaire a
couple of years ago when I was working on a piece for The Atlantic. I
was arrested in Liberia once.
How do you get out of those situations?
In both cases the key was getting a message to the American embassy.
Once it becomes a diplomatic issue they can make that calculation that I've
just described for you. Again it's something that a white American can benefit
from where Africans don't. There was a moment in Zaire when we were
incommunicado and things started looking bad. It was not clear how things were
going to work out. I was scared; my wife was scared too. But most of the time
if you do your homework and are with the right people, and you always move
around with guides and escorts, then there's a way of doing this that will keep
you out of trouble.
What do you think about the Masai people in Kenya?
The Masai are being exploited by well-meaning foreigners and by tourists
who are fascinated by their exotic attire and lifestyle. They are being
exploited by their political leaders in Kenya, including this guy William ole
Ntimama, who is their leader and spokesman but who is milking their resources
for his own personal benefit. That's the kind of thing that goes on in an
imperfect political system, where there is very little accountability. He's
both exploiting them financially and using them as cannon fodder. If there were
a more enlightened political culture in Kenya, which is what a great many
Kenyans are working, struggling, and dying for, then the Masai would benefit
too. But for the moment they're getting the short end of the stick. If you go
on one of these tours of the Masai lands looking at wildlife, it's a very
powerful experience to check all this out. But white people from abroad come
and treat the Masai like zoo animals. To most foreigners they're another form
of wildlife.
What do you hope readers will get from your article?
Two things. One, a greater appreciation that ethnic conflict flows from
the top down, that it's not this spontaneous, primitive impulse among Africans,
but rather a consequence of political calculation by tyrannical leaders.
Secondly, that not all African countries are the same. Some have strengths that
others don't have. I hope that some of the things that have prevented Kenya
from sliding down into the abyss will help to illuminate for readers why other
countries have slipped down into the abyss. I hope to give readers a
sense that Africa is complicated like everywhere else. There are reasons why
these things happen or don't happen. I hope also to convey a sense, which I
think is often lacking in American press coverage of Africa, that there are
articulate African voices out there. Too often they are quoted just as victims
or as objects. White people and diplomats and aid workers are quoted explaining
what's going on. I tried to include as many intelligent African voices as I
could. There are a lot of very intelligent, very wise, astute, and
well-informed Kenyans. I also hope to explain that the U.S. has a role in
Kenya. It was, until not long ago, a positive constructive role.
What caused the great shift in U.S. involvement in Kenya?
Mainly the change in ambassadors. There was a guy named Smith Hempstone, who
was, ironically, a right-wing Republican buddy of George Bush but who
nevertheless was an inspired diplomat in Kenya. He's been replaced by a woman
who has not been an inspired diplomat in my judgment. I think sometimes we make
apologies for Africans and hold Africa to a lower standard, which is
patronizing and counterproductive. I think we fail to make the distinction
between good Africans and bad Africans. We tend to think that the reasons for
Africa's problems are cultural or exotic, and they're not in my opinion.
They're the same reasons that have created conflict in all parts of the world.
The solutions, in my judgment, are the same as they are in all parts of the
world: democracy, human rights, free press, free association, rule of law. I
think we should be throwing our lot in with those institutions instead of being
understanding of the cultural sensibilities of gangsters and despots. I think
that is what the ambassador hasn't realized. Ethnic conflict flows from the top
down. It's a by-product of tyranny. I think most Americans still think that
when they see Africans killing each other there's some exotic explanation for
it, that there's some primitive, inherent savagery that is impelling people to
kill each other. One would think that the tribe of Bach, Beethoven, and Goethe
had long since proven that we're all capable of doing bad things to each
other.
Interview by Marty Hergert
Copyright © 1996 by The Atlantic Monthly Company. All rights
reserved.
|