Mexico's New President Is Off to a Troubling Start

More

Enrique Peña Nieto is already governing more like a machine politician than a true democrat.

mexico protestor banner.jpg
A protester throws a smoke screen canister back at the police during protests against Mexico's new president, Enrique Pena Nieto, in Mexico City on December 1, 2012. (Reuters)

Peace and prosperity in North America is best served not by giving Mexico's new president, Enrique Peña Nieto, the benefit of the doubt, but by ramping up independent oversight of his actions and proposals. Otherwise, Mexico could follow the path of Egypt, where formally democratic elections have already given way to authoritarian politics under the leadership of Mohamed Morsi. In order to avoid such a scenario, U.S. civil society and the media need to resist the hype driven by Peña Nieto, who was inaugurated on December 1, and his allies in the Washington policy community and pay attention to what is really happening south of the Rio Grande. The hope for Mexico's future does not lie in Peña Nieto, but in the increasingly self-confident and non-violent social movements that will be challenging him at every step.

There has been a push in recent weeks to help Mexico overcome its "image problem" by overlooking news about drug violence, which has taken at least 60,000 lives over the past six years. Mexico, we are told, has become a model of successful economic development in Latin America. It supposedly has a burgeoning middle class, a well-established division of powers, and a free press. Meanwhile, Peña Nieto is painted as a pragmatist who is interested in establishing a close relationship with the United States and wants to implement fiscal, labor, anti-corruption and energy reforms. Recent pieces by Andrew Selee from the Woodrow Wilson Institute, Peter Hakim from the Inter-American Dialogue, Shannon O'Neil of the Council on Foreign Relations and Jorge Casteñeda in Foreign Affairs capture this dominant position well, as well as Peña Nieto's own article in The Washington Post.

The Democracy Report

According to this view, Mexico is supposedly moving in the right direction and the U.S. government, the media and civil society on both sides of the border should be patient with and support the country's new leader.

Such an approach is both wrong and dangerous. Numbers show that the Mexican economy is in fact stuck in a highly problematic low-growth cycle. According to the Mexican National Institute of Statistics, growth averaged only 1.7 percent between 2000 and 2010, underperforming in comparison to the rest of Latin America. During the 2008-2009 global economic recession, Mexico lost more economic ground than any other country in its region, losing 9.4 percent of GDP over four quarters, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Its recent rebound, growing at 5.5 percent in 2010 and almost 4 percent in 2011, only implies that the economy has managed to crawl itself out of the hole -- not that it has started to take off.

It is true that more Mexicans are using cellphones, computers, and credit cards as well as purchasing cars, homes and household appliances. But these external trappings of "middle class" life hide the fact that poverty has actually been on the rise, from 42.7 percent to 51.3 percent of the population since 2006. Prices for basic goods have skyrocketed and real wages have shrunk by 3.5 percent over the same period. With a Gini coefficient of 0.51, Mexico also ranks as one of the most unequal countries on earth. Ten families control 10 percent of GDP and Mexico is the home to the wealthiest man in the world, Carlos Slim.

This concentration of power at the top is holding back economic growth. The neoliberal economic strategy that has dominated Mexico since the economic crisis of 1982 has created a new, highly empowered upper crust that's connected to international capital markets but contributes little to the national economy. Both the OECD and the World Economic Forum have given Mexico failing grades with regard to monopoly control and economic competitiveness.

These new plutocrats will not cede power on their own. Only a countervailing force can kick the Mexican economy into action by redistributing social power and overturning the trickle-down theory of economic development. It is not enough to create a few new wealthy families to "compete" with the ones who are already in control, as Peña Nieto seems to be interested in doing. If Mexico hopes to escape from its low-level equilibrium trap it needs to break altogether with the neoliberal model of growth without equality.

Peña Nieto and his Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which ruled the country uninterrupted for 71 years until 2000, cannot be expected to stand up to the robber barons -- it was Nieto's party that put them in power in the first place. The last three presidents from the PRI were responsible for establishing the tenets of the contemporary growth system. Despite lip service to the contrary, Peña Nieto´s objective is to continue on with their legacy instead of looking toward new solutions.

Peña Nieto´s first actions and decisions offer strong evidence. For his cabinet, he has preferred cronies over experts. The core is made up of five ex-governors from four of the most politically backward states in the country, states where the PRI has ruled for over 80 years without interruption. There are two ex-governors from the state of Hidalgo, one from the State of Mexico (Peña Nieto himself is a former governor of this state), one from Coahuila and one from Quintana Roo.

When the PRI lost the presidency in 2000, these states lagged far behind the rest of the country with regard to institutional development and democratic politics. Loosened from the moors of the pre-2000 "imperial presidency," the PRI governors consolidated their positions. They ruled liked the modern equivalent of feudal lords, repressing opposition voices and the local press in order to guarantee that they wouldn't be held accountable.

The nine states that have yet to undergo a change in power are arguably the country's most corrupt, violent, and unfree. One former governor of Quintana Roo, for example, Mario Villanueva, has pleaded guilty to helping launder millions of dollars for cocaine traffickers. In Tamaulipas, also a state that has remained in PRI hands, former governor Tomas Yarrington is presently under investigation by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and has been issued an arrest warrant for money laundering by the Mexican authorities.

There are already troubling signs that the PRI's repressive ways could return to the national stage.

Troubling signs that the PRI's repressive ways could return to the national stage were on display in the violence that took place on December 1 in the streets of Mexico City, as Peña Nieto was being inaugurated. Dozens of protesters were brutally beaten by the police, and some were severely wounded. Meanwhile, small groups of youth -- supposedly anti-Peña Nieto protestors -- threw Molotov cocktails at the Chamber of Deputies and meandered freely through downtown, destroying shop windows. The police then arbitrarily detained dozens of non-violent protesters, many of them students, who had nothing to do with those who may have committed crimes, sending a clear message that no forms of protest or resistance to authority are to be tolerated. Many of them still languish in jail awaiting trail and are already considered to be the first political prisoners of the new regime.

Evidence has mounted that the aggressive protest tactics which provoked the police repression may have been pushed by professional provocateurs for the purpose of discrediting the growing non-violent student movement. Numerous accounts and videos collected by the local media attest to the presence of outside elements and preliminary investigations have revealed that at least one group of supposed "protesters" was paid the equivalent of US$25 each to "destroy anything in sight." 

Enormous, peaceful protests led by political parties and independent citizen movements have in recent years been considered a mark of Mexico's democratic progress. In 2006, a million or more people marched on Mexico City's central square during post-electoral protests, making these mobilizations the largest in modern Mexico's history. Last year, tens of thousands of demonstrators throughout the country protested against Felipe Calderon's U.S.-backed "drug war." This year, hundreds of thousands of youth poured into the streets after the July elections to protest against vote-buying, media manipulation and alleged electoral fraud.

Violence was never a problem -- which isn't surprising, because even the most radical opposition leaders in Mexico explicitly reject violence. But the PRI governors' bloody ascent to national prominence suggests that the new ruling coalition may not share this same commitment.

Beyond the events of inauguration day, the first legislative bills Peña Nieto has sent to Congress confirm the suspicion that he wants to bring back the ways of the past. His first proposal is to roll back the key accountability initiatives of his predecessors, such as the federal government's anti-graft agency and the federal police secretariat. These two agencies were, at least on paper, important institutions in Mexico's post-2000 democratic transition. The anti-corruption agency was significantly strengthened in 2003 by President Vicente Fox so that it could implement a landmark new civil service law and more aggressively attack corruption. The police secretariat was created in 2000 for the purpose of professionalizing law enforcement by taking it out from under the control of the politicized Secretary of Internal Affairs.

By eliminating both agencies, and returning the police to Internal Affairs, Peña Nieto sends a clear signal that politics will trump professionalism and expertise during his administration. PRI congressmen have also followed up by cutting thousands of top public servants out of the national civil service law in order to make space for cronies.

Peña Nieto tries to talk a good game. During his recent visit with President Barack Obama and in his inauguration day speech, he spoke about the need to expand democracy, bring peace and jump-start economic development. But so far, everything Mexico's new president has actually done points to a return to the past. Even his highly touted "Pact for Mexico" is problematic, since its real purpose is to help him avoid public debate of his proposals in Congress and the media.

The good news is that Mexican civil society is alive and well. Despite some commentators' hope that Peña Nieto's administration will squelch the emerging non-violent #YoSoy132 student movement, a new generation of Mexican activists, journalists and society leaders are becoming even more energized, better convinced than ever that they must take responsibility for their own destiny -- not wait around for the same old politicians to resolve the country's problems.

Jump to comments
Presented by

John Mill Ackerman

John M. Ackerman, a professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico and a visiting scholar at American University. He is the editor-in-chief of the Mexican Law Review and a columnist for La Jornada newspaper and Proceso magazine.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Sad Desk Lunch: Is This How You Want to Die?

How to avoid working through lunch, and diseases related to social isolation.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down

More in Global

Just In