The Fate of Chen Guangcheng

More

Chen-Guangcheng-008.jpgObviously this is a big, fluid, significant, and fast-moving story, about which I'll try to say more by this evening after talking with friends in China and elsewhere. Just one point for the moment:

The diplomatic situation now is tricky for all parties, but it poses far bigger and more complex challenges for the Chinese government than it does for America's. This piece, by Yiyi Lu, on the WSJ site, does a good job of explaining why. Jonathan Watts, of the Guardian, has a complementary analysis. (Guardian photo of Chen.)

I recommend reading last night's post from the Atlantic's Max Fisher, about the reasons the situation is tricky for the United States as well. But I disagree with its headline -- that what to do about Chen is the "toughest foreign policy choice" Obama has faced. For my money, the two contenders for that honor are what to do about Afghanistan, and what to do about Iran-Israel nexus and all is ramification. In the next tier of tough decisions would be North Korea, the Germany-induced European meltdown, Egypt and the Arab spring, Libya and Syria. Oh, and climate change.

I very much agree with the post's emphasis on how carefully the United States -- and other Western powers -- need to move, given the reaction in China. But by contrast with, say, choices about Afghanistan, for America the Chen situation presents what seems to be a classic "bright line" case. Chen Guangcheng has obvious and well-founded reasons to fear persecution in his own country for his political views. His request for political asylum would seem to fit exactly the standards for which such asylum was designed.* So the U.S. needs to be shrewd, diplomatic, mindful of its whole strategic relationship with China, and so on in considering its next steps. But on the question of whether to grant asylum, if indeed asylum is what Chen turns out to want, based on everything we know now the only choice is to say Yes.

More later.
__
* This is very different from the case of Wang Lijun, the police chief who had been Bo Xilai's ally in Chongqing before their falling-out, apparently over the murder case involving Bo's wife. When Wang presented himself at the U.S. Consulate in Chengdu, he would have had a much harder time making a case for asylum, since until very recently he had been the one using the power of the law against his enemies.

Presented by

James Fallows is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and has written for the magazine since the late 1970s. He has reported extensively from outside the United States and once worked as President Carter's chief speechwriter. His latest book is China Airborne. More

James Fallows is based in Washington as a national correspondent for The Atlantic. He has worked for the magazine for nearly 30 years and in that time has also lived in Seattle, Berkeley, Austin, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai, and Beijing. He was raised in Redlands, California, received his undergraduate degree in American history and literature from Harvard, and received a graduate degree in economics from Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. In addition to working for The Atlantic, he has spent two years as chief White House speechwriter for Jimmy Carter, two years as the editor of US News & World Report, and six months as a program designer at Microsoft. He is an instrument-rated private pilot. He is also now the chair in U.S. media at the U.S. Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, in Australia.

Fallows has been a finalist for the National Magazine Award five times and has won once; he has also won the American Book Award for nonfiction and a N.Y. Emmy award for the documentary series Doing Business in China. He was the founding chairman of the New America Foundation. His recent books Blind Into Baghdad (2006) and Postcards From Tomorrow Square (2009) are based on his writings for The Atlantic. His latest book is China Airborne. He is married to Deborah Fallows, author of the recent book Dreaming in Chinese. They have two married sons.

Fallows welcomes and frequently quotes from reader mail sent via the "Email" button below. Unless you specify otherwise, we consider any incoming mail available for possible quotation -- but not with the sender's real name unless you explicitly state that it may be used. If you are wondering why Fallows does not use a "Comments" field below his posts, please see previous explanations here and here.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

How have stories changed in the age of social media? The minds behind House of Cards, This American Life, and The Moth discuss.


Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Global

From This Author

Just In