(See two updates below.) This should go without saying, but since I haven't yet seen it elsewhere on our site:
For the record, Rick Perry during last night's debate showed his trademark command of details, and owes the government and people of Turkey an apology, for calling Turkey, a U.S. ally through NATO:
"...a country that is being ruled by, what many would perceive to be Islamic terrorists..."
Here is a temperate statement in response just now from the Turkish ambassador to the United States. At the moment, the United States has its disagreements on some issues with the Turkish government, as it does with most of its other allies. And in Turkey as in many parts of the world the role of Islam in secular government is an ongoing political issue. (Turkey has a longer record of wrestling with this question than just about any other modern state. See: Kemal Ataturk, career and thoughts of.) But "Islamic terrorists"???
As the Turkish ambassador puts it:
Contrary to statements during the debate, Turkey receives no significant sums of foreign aid dollars from the U.S. Indeed, Turkey is a strong and growing trading partner with the U.S. in general, and with Texas in particular creating thousands of jobs throughout that state....I call that a glass half-full perspective! Maybe this episode got no notice because of Perry's past debate record and the fact that he's not going to win the nomination. Still I thought it deserved mention.
While it was unfortunate, we do hope this episode in last night's debate leads to a better informed foreign policy discussion among the Republican Party candidates, one where long-standing allies are treated with respect not disdain.
Update. A reader on what might have happened:
My guess would be that he thought he was talking about Pakistan, and mixed up the countries. The argument about being governed by terrorists can be made about Pakistan, and there has been a fair amount of comment recently. Mr. Perry just blanked on the country and grabbed the first one he could find in the "Middle East" category in this head.
Of course, this may be giving him too much of the benefit of the doubt....
Update-update Another reader offers another hypothesis:
Perry wasn't mixing up Turkey and Pakistan. He was responding to the following question:
"Governor Perry, since the Islamist-oriented party took over in Turkey, the murder rate of women has increased 1,400 percent there. Press freedom has declined to the level of Russia. The prime minister of Turkey has embraced Hamas and Turkey has threatened military force against both Israel and Cypress. Given Turkey's turn, do you believe Turkey still belongs in NATO?"
Bret Baier loaded the question to such an extent that Perry had to choose between either defending Turkey or agreeing with the premise of the question. Of course, he chose a third way by doubling down with the word "terrorist."