Obama's No-Apologies Foreign Policy in the State of the Union

The president made clear he sees his record as point of strength for the coming election.

SOTU Jan25 p.jpg

U.S. President Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington / Reuters

The theme for Barack Obama's discussion of foreign policy in his 2012 State of the Union address was "No Apology." After months of listening to his Republican rivals pummel his handling of world affairs, he made clear that he sees foreign policy as one of his strengths and he intends to make the most of it.

Obama both began and ended his speech by touting his foreign policy successes: After nine years of war, no Americans are fighting in Iraq. U.S. troops have begun to come home from Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden no longer threatens the United States. Muammar Qaddafi no longer terrorizes Libya. America's friendships and alliances around the world are stronger than ever. In all, under his watch, "America is back."

In an implicit recognition of Republican claims that he is more interested in apologizing for America's mistakes than advancing its interests, Obama dismissed talk of U.S. decline, and embraced American exceptionalism.

Obama highlighted the sweeping changes that have rocked the Middle East and North Africa over the past year. He declared that the United States had a "huge stake" in the region's transformation, said his administration would stand "against violence and intimidation," and suggested that in Syria the Assad regime's days were numbered. But the president offered no specific plans or initiatives to promote the forces of liberty and democracy in the region, and he stopped well short of pledging to unseat the government in Damascus.

Israel merited only a brief mention, but it was forceful and to the point. The United States and Israel are enjoying their closest military cooperation ever.

Obama singled out Iran when he vowed to act decisively against regimes that threatened America's citizens, friends, and interests. He repeated his commitment "to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon" and insisted that all options were on the table. But he was also careful to offer Tehran an olive branch, saying that it was within Iran's power to reach a peaceful resolution of the dispute.

Obama glossed over other potential threats to American security. He said nothing about China's growing military might or the increasingly hostile rhetoric coming from Russia. He said nothing about North Korea. The challenges that remain in Afghanistan went unmentioned.

But this State of the Union address was never intended to be a policy speech. It was instead the opening salvo in his 2012 presidential campaign. And Obama's message to his Republican opponents was that he has no intention of running away from his foreign policy record. He is instead going to run on it.

This article originally appeared at CFR.org, an Atlantic partner site.

Presented by

James M. Lindsay is director of studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. He writes at The Water's Edge.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"


This Japanese Inn Has Been Open For 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.


What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.


Is Minneapolis the Best City in America?

No other place mixes affordability, opportunity, and wealth so well.

More in Global

Just In