Eventually the siege will end but the fundamental challenge to Beijing will not
Residents gather on a street during a demonstration in Wukan village / Reuters

China's Pakistan Conundrum
Gay Rights in Africa
The Stakes in Durban
Islamism and Pluralism
The good news is that by late November after a few months of protest -- some of it violent -- the villagers succeeded in ousting the two village leaders. The Chinese media argued at the time that Guangdong, under Party Secretary Wang Yang (a candidate for the Standing Committee of the Politburo in the 2012-2013 leadership transition), was pursuing a new approach to social unrest, one that tried to "balance maintaining stability and basic rights while helping people to express their needs."
The bad news is that the balance still isn't quite right. In recent days, the Wukan villagers have seized control of the village, demonstrating against the alleged cover-up of police brutality that led to the death on December 11 of Xue Jinbo, a demonstration leader. The Chinese media have also gone dark. There is no more talk about the new way of handling protests. On December 14, the acting mayor of Shanwei City Wu Zili said that in regards to organizations planning to "incite trouble," the government is determined to crack down on the destruction of public property and the obstruction of official business. The local government is now trying to starve the villagers out by setting up five roadblocks with guards all around the village to prevent food and other resources from coming in and workers from leaving.
Eventually the siege will end but the fundamental challenge to Beijing will not. Every year, despite the country's impressive economic growth, the number of protests grows. By one estimate, Beijing now contends with 180,000 so-called "mass incidents". The why of these protests is no mystery: the lack of the rule of law, transparency, and official accountability. These are the structural elements that define the country's political system and allow corruption to flourish. In the Wukan case, the villagers are protesting corruption in both land sales and the electoral process. Whether the protests are over these issues or the environment or defective products, the root cause is the same.
Beijing's take away from the Wukan protest
probably won't be much more than "It's time to launch another
[ineffective] anti-corruption campaign." The real take away, however, is
that it is time to listen to what Premier Wen Jiabao had to say a few months ago
in Dalian: "We must govern the country by law ... We need to uphold
judicial justice ... People's democratic rights and interests prescribed
in the Constitution must be protected. The most important ones are the
right to vote and to stay informed about, participate in, and oversee
government affairs." Put more bluntly, if the 5th generation of Party
leaders doesn't listen to Wen and seize the initiative on political
reform, it is looking more and more likely that the Chinese people will.This article originally appeared at CFR.org, an Atlantic partner site.




Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus