Obama's Iran Briefing Last Week -- What Was He Trying to Say?

Eight or nine of us hacks were called into the White House last week to meet with President Obama on the subject of Iran, and I think we all left the Roosevelt Room with completely different understandings of what we had just heard. The Washington Post's David Ignatius left thinking that the President was offering, in his usual subtle way, a new opening for diplomatic engagement. Robert Kagan, of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, left thinking the President was trying to underscore his toughness on the issue of multilateral sanctions. I left thinking, "Why no snacks?" They didn't even offer us fruit juice or water, and it was a hundred degrees outside.

I also left the room thinking -- and I later had my thinking confirmed by a (you should pardon the expression) senior administration official I spoke to that night -- that Kagan's interpretation of the briefing's rationale was more accurate than was Ignatius's. "We have some real achievements in seeing the sanction on Iran take hold," the official said. "The President said we are hearing rumblings of discontent on the Iranian street about the sanctions, and we wanted you guys to know that we feel the pressure we're putting on Iran is beginning to work."

But what about the idea that the briefing was called in order to issue a new invitation to the Iranians to engage? "That's not why you were there," he said. "But our policy is consistent. We're ready to engage. The President has said consistently from the beginning that he is willing to talk to the Iranians about the whole range of issues, but we believe that pressure through sanctions is a necessity."

The Obama Administration -- as I hope you will see in my upcoming Atlantic cover story -- has had a consistent approach to this issue throughout its term in office. The first year of the Administration, the emphasis was on clean-slate engagement. When the Iranians chose not to shake Obama's outstetched hand, the Administration did not drop in a huff the idea of engagement, but started layering in more and more sanctions, to stimulate Iranian interest in engagement and present to them the downside of their continued pursuit of nuclear weapons. This is the phase we are in today. The next phase is three-fold: The ever-present invitation to talk will still be on the table, but sanctions will become stronger and stronger, and, as we turn the corner into next year, keeping in mind that Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said earlier this year that Iran is one-to-three years away from crossing the nuclear threshold, the discussion will include a possible military intervention. As you will see in the cover story (it will be posted soon enough, I think), I believe it is plausible that President Obama will one day consider a military option against Iran. I don't think it's likely, but I do think it is plausible.

Presented by

Jeffrey Goldberg is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and a recipient of the National Magazine Award for Reporting. He is the author of Prisoners: A Story of Friendship and Terror. More

Before joining The Atlantic in 2007, Goldberg was a Middle East correspondent, and the Washington correspondent, for The New Yorker. He was previouslly a correspondent for The New York Times Magazine and New York magazine. He has also written for the Jewish Daily Forward and was a columnist for The Jerusalem Post.

Goldberg's book Prisoners was hailed as one of the best books of 2006 by the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Slate, The Progressive, Washingtonian magazine, and Playboy. He received the 2003 National Magazine Award for Reporting for his coverage of Islamic terrorism and the 2005 Anti-Defamation League Daniel Pearl Prize. He is also the winner of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists prize for best international investigative journalist; the Overseas Press Club award for best human-rights reporting; and the Abraham Cahan Prize in Journalism.

In 2001, Goldberg was appointed the Syrkin Fellow in Letters of the Jerusalem Foundation, and in 2002 he became a public-policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C.

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This wildly inventive short film takes you on a whirling, spinning tour of the Big Apple

Video

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Faces of #BlackLivesMatter

Scenes from a recent protest in New York City

Video

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life

The Supreme Court justice talks gender equality and marriage.

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Global

From This Author

Just In