What does the "Shock Doctrine" have to do with the accidental killing of a Polish immigrant in Canada?
Video recently emerged from mid-October of Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers at the Vancouver International Airport using a Taser to subdue a lost and agitated 40-year-old Polish immigrant, Robert Dziekanski. Horribly, the Taser shock would kill Dziekanski. The footage of his death, now exposed globally via YouTube, has aroused widespread indignation and renewed debate on the use of electroshock weapons.
Dziekanski's was the 16th Taser-related death in Canada since 2003; the 17th happened less than a week later when Quilem Registre died after a confrontation with police in Montreal; and Amnesty International counts more than 270 Taser-related deaths in the U.S. since 2001. Civil liberties groups, including Amnesty, have called for a moratorium on Tasers until police can implement better training and procedures, and the medical risks can be fully understood.
Writing last week in The Los Angeles Times, however, the internationally renowned journalist and anti-globalization activist Naomi Klein now suggests that, while all such concern about the when and how of police Taser use may be well and good, it's ultimately small thinking, missing the real context in which Dziekanski's death "must" be understood. "... what happened in Vancouver was about more than a weapon," Klein writes. "It was also about an increasingly brutal side of the global economy -- about the reality that many victims of various forms of economic 'shock therapy' face at our borders."
As it happens, Klein's argument about the meaning of Dziekanski's death is identical to an argument she makes about tasers in her latest book, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. The "shock doctrine," she explains, is an influential but largely unknown theory, held by major corporate interests and global capitalist elites, that establishing a modern free-market economy where none yet exists requires a kind of collective crisis. "A crisis that opens up a 'window of opportunity' -- when people and societies are too disoriented to protect their own interests -- for radically remaking countries using the trademark tactic of rapid-fire economic shock therapy and, all too often, less metaphorical forms of shock: the shock of the police truncheon, the Taser gun or the electric prod in the prison cell."
In the same terms Klein now eulogizes, "It turns out that [Dziekanski] didn't just die after being shocked -- his life was marked by shock as well." With the fall of communism, she explains, the Polish government of Dziekanski's youth opted for 'shock therapy," eliminating price controls, slashing subsidies, and privatizing industries to jolt Poland out of economic stagnation and get in moving as quickly as possible toward the modern industrial "normality" of the West.
Of course, on this standard of normality, Poland never arrived. The country's jobless rate remains the highest in the expanded 27-nation EU, for example, with approximately 40 percent of young Polish workers now unemployed. In recent years, Dziekanski was among them; and then, with his ill-fated immigration to Canada, he was among upward of 2 million Poles to have left their country in recent years seeking work, a modicum of job security, and maybe, as Klein would have it, the makings of a "normal" life abroad. "But there isn't enough normal to go around, or so we are told," she observes. "And so, as migrants move, they are often met with other shocks. A treacherous electrified fence on Spain's southern border, or a Taser gun on the U.S.-Mexican border."