As sushi has gone mainstream, lower cost suppliers have come into the market offering fishy products.
The type is too small to read so I've done some cropping:
Professor Reilly asks:
What is puzzling me is why this product "minced tuna" was used in sushi products. The label (copy attached) clearly states that the product must be cooked before consumption and it is for industrial uses only (labelled not for retail).
Those are good questions, but here's another, equally alarming. What's that strangely formatted Nutrition Facts label? It does not precisely follow FDA design or content requirements.
This is a red flag. If the company is not following labeling rules, it might not be following other rules either--safety, for example.
Safety? Uh oh.
- Tanks used for storage of process waters have apparent visible debris, filth and microbiological contamination.
- There is no laboratory analysis for water used in ice manufacturing at the [redacted] facility to show the water used to make ice is potable.
- Apparent bird feces were observed on the ice manufacturing equipment at Moon Fishery; insects and filth were observed in and on the equipment.
- Tuna processed at your facility, which is consumed raw or cooked, comes in direct contact with water and ice.
I draw several lessons from this episode:
- Food is safer when cooked.
- Labels need to be read--and followed--carefully.
- Raw sushi is a high risk product, especially if it doesn't cost much.
- The FDA needs to be doing a lot more inspecting of overseas facilities, and before they cause problems.
All of this means that we need a better food safety system, one that can address the enormous proportion of our food supply that comes to us from countries with weaker food safety standards.
This post originally appeared on Food Politics, an Atlantic partner site.
This article available online at: