New research demonstrates a psychological preference for physically formidable leaders that may be due to evolution, not culture
PROBLEM: Taller U.S. presidential candidates have won the majority of elections between 1789 and 2008, and have lost only three times since the rise of television in American homes. Do candidates who appear physically stronger really benefit from the so-called "Presidential Height Index"?
Why We Need Bilingual Classrooms
How to Bounce Back From a Divorce
RESULTS: In the first experiment, 64 percent of students drew a leader that was taller than the typical citizen. The results of the second test revealed a statistically significant association between height and perceived leadership capability as well as interest in running for a political office. The literature review also revealed that preference for taller leaders is a universal trait that extends to various cultures and societies, including ancient Mayans, pre-classical Greeks, and even animals.
CONCLUSION: We tend to prefer taller candidates. The authors say in a news release that this preference may have helped ensure survival in ancient human history and "likely reflects an evolved psychological trait, independent of any cultural conditioning."
IMPLICATION: In 2008, a 6'1" Barack Obama towered over the 5'8" John McCain. Come November 2012, however, the President may lose his evolutionary advantage in the polls if he faces off against Rick Perry or Mitt Romney, who are 6'1" and 6'2" respectively.
SOURCE: The full study, "Caveman Politics: Evolutionary Leadership Preferences and Physical Stature," is published in the journal Social Science Quarterly.
Image: REUTERS/POOL New.
This article available online at: