Coke's Unconscionable New Ad

More

Why Coca-Cola's assertion that "all calories count" is inappropriately misleading

Advertising is inherently self-serving -- that's its job. No one expects a corporate ad, or a political one for that matter, to be a public service announcement or deliver a health education message. Self-serving is one thing, though, and unethical is quite another.

Coca-Cola's latest attempt to position itself against the rising tide of concern about the role of sodas in the obesity epidemic is unconscionable, because of this statement: "All calories count. No matter where they come from including Coca-Cola and everything else with calories."

For Coca-Cola to suggest that all calories are equal flies in the face of reality as best as we can determine it. Many foods and drinks contain calories but also nutritional value; these are the calories that fuel our daily lives. Added sugars like those in Coca-Cola, however, add calories but no nutrition-- so-called " empty calories." According to the Food and Drug Administration, "In some foods, like most candies and sodas, all the calories are empty calories." So, Coca-Cola's claim that "all calories count" is extraordinarily misleading.

Coca-Cola wants us to ignore the considerable research confirming that sugary soda is a major contributor to obesity, and that it has no nutritional value. In the fall of 2012, three separate studies were published providing evidence that soda leads to obesity in children and adults, and worsens weight problems of those genetically pre-disposed to obesity.

If Coca-Cola really wants to help improve the public's health it should dramatically alter its product line. Short of that, Coca-Cola could use its considerable advertising muscle to promote healthy exercise, yes, but when it does so as a ploy to confuse the public about the dangers of its products, that's not a public service, that's unethical.



A version of this article also appears on Johns Hopkins' Berman Institute of Bioethics Bulletin.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Ruth Faden is the Wagley Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics.  She is the co-author of Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Social Security: The Greatest Government Policy of All Time?

It's the most effective anti-poverty program in U.S. history. So why do some people hate it?


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Adventures in Legal Weed

Colorado is now well into its first year as the first state to legalize recreational marijuana. How's it going? James Hamblin visits Aspen.

Video

What Makes a Story Great?

The storytellers behind House of CardsandThis American Life reflect on the creative process.

Video

Tracing Sriracha's Origin to Thailand

Ever wonder how the wildly popular hot sauce got its name? It all started in Si Racha.

Video

Where Confiscated Wildlife Ends Up

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Writers

Up
Down

More in Health

Just In