Skip Navigation
Jane Black

Jane Black - Jane Black, formerly a food writer at The Washington Post, is currently at work on a book about food culture and class in Huntington, West Virginia. Learn more at www.janeblack.net.

The Congressional War on Food Safety and Food Stamps

By Jane Black
Jun 14 2011, 10:55 AM ET Comment

Today, the House is voting on a horrible idea: cuts to the inspection and food assistance programs we so desperately need

RTR2NH7X_wide.jpg

Just when things were looking up—more money for school lunch, a new plate instead of the Food Pyramid—Congress steps up with a really bad idea. Today, the House is set to vote on a bill that would cut funds for food safety inspections and eliminate federal food assistance for some of the most vulnerable Americans.

The bill is H.R. 2112, or the 2012 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. Passed out of committee on May 31, it funds a vast assortment of programs from SNAP (formerly known as food stamps) and WIC, which supports pregnant and nursing women and young children, to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's food inspection service and Michelle Obama's pet project the Healthy Food Financing Initiative, which aims to make healthy foods more available in low-income neighborhoods.

Thanks to the first lady, food policy has become fashionable. But the new bill proves the food lobby isn't yet strong enough to keep away hatchet-wielding reps who want to boost their deficit-cutting credentials. In a statement late Monday night, the Obama administration voiced "serious concerns" about the bill, noting that cuts to the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service might require the agency to furlough inspectors—hardly wise when the massive E. coli outbreak in Europe is a reminder of the vulnerability of the global food system.

Anti-poverty groups, meanwhile, are panicking. If the bill passes, mandatory food funding will be cut $46.5 million, with California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois taking the biggest hits. Reductions to federal nutrition programs could push more people—130,000 seniors, and as many as 475,000 pregnant or nursing women, infants, and children, according to hunger relief charity Feeding America—to local charities for food assistance. And this at the time when other new cuts will slash the availability of government commodities that are distributed to church food pantries, soup kitchens, and other local charities.

The only good news is that the Senate still must craft its own spending bill before legislation goes to the president. It's a chance, albeit a small one, to apply a little sense to the vicious debate over dollars and cents.


Image: Laszlo Balogh/Reuters

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Study: We're Biased Against obese People—Even If They Get Thin Obesity Stigma Stays
Even After Weight Loss
The Rock-Mining Children of Sierra Leone Have Not Found Peace 10 Years After Civil War, No Peace for Sierra Leone's Kids
Under Bloomberg's Soda Ban, The Original Four Loko Would Be Legal Under Bloomberg's Soda Ban, Four Loko Would Be Legal
This Graph Is Disastrous for Print and Great for Facebook—or the Opposite! The End of Print Media
in 1 Simple Graph
The Edwards Trial: A Bad Idea From Before the Start The Edwards Trial: A Massive Waste of Time

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

The Unreal World

May 31, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)