New Food Group's Mission: 'Can't We All Just All Get Along?'

AGree hopes to unite organic food advocates and the food industry. Will it be any different from past (failed) attempts?

RTXUGZ5edit.jpg
The quotation in the title of this post is from Steve Clapp's recent article in Food Chemical News about the unspoken message behind formation of a new group called AGree (agriculture, agree, get it?). AGree, according to its gorgeous website, aims to "advance the well-being and prosperity of people in the United States and abroad by transforming food and agriculture policy":

AGree is a bold new initiative designed to tackle long-term agricultural, food and rural policy issues. AGree has significant funding from eight of the world's leading foundations for at least the next eight years...We also recognize the interconnected nature of agriculture policy globally and we seek to break down traditional silos and work across issue areas.

The funders? These are heavy hitters: Ford Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the McKnight Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and the Walton Family Foundation.

Who is running the show? AGree is to be led by former Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman; Gary Hirshberg, chairman and CEO of Stonyfield Farm; Jim Moseley, USDA deputy secretary during the first Bush administration; and Emmy Simmons, former assistant administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

What's the plan? AGree will "Build bridges among groups that have not traditionally worked together...This approach is needed because policy reform efforts targeting the food and agriculture system have traditionally operated in many independent silos—governmental, political, stakeholder, geographic and substantive—that have made transformative change impossible."

Steve Clapp quotes Dan Glickman saying that AGree is going to "operate outside the partisan political process" because "food policy is too important to be left to the food industry."

What are we to make of this? It's much too soon to say but it reminds me of two previous efforts to forge consensus among stakeholders.

One is a group that I belong to called PAPSAC, which stands for Private and Public, Scientific, Academic, and Consumer Food Policy Group. The group, organized by Ray Goldberg, has been meeting for about 15 years, first at the Harvard Business School and more recently at the Kennedy School. The meeting brings together CEOs of food and agribusiness companies, government officials, people in business and public relations, academics, and advocates to exchange views in private. Its original purpose was to try to find middle ground on controversial issues such as genetically modified foods. But one of the unstated hopes was that consumer advocates would relent on opposition to GM foods.

The second example is the ill-fated Smart Choices. This, you may recall, was an attempt of the Keystone Center to get food companies and academics to agree on common standards for front-of-package labeling. When it became evident that food companies were calling the shots, the consumer advocates dropped out. The result? The Smart Choices logo appeared on Froot Loops and failed the laugh test.

The problem with attempts to build consensus is that the sides aren't equal. Agribusiness calls the shots or won't play.

I'm curious to know how the leadership intends to proceed. At The Atlantic's Food Summit and the recent Future of Food meeting in Washington, Gary Hirshberg made it clear that he is a strong proponent of organic agriculture and strongly against genetically modified foods. I don't see easy bridges between stakeholders with this particular issue, but maybe AGree will start with easier ones.

If I read between the lines correctly, AGree will convene meetings and produce policy papers. The group seems to be steering clear of the 2012 Farm Bill until after it's passed.

As with all such things, let's wish the AGree leaders luck and give them a chance to see what they can do.


This post also appears on Food Politics.
Image: Eric Thayer/Reuters

Presented by

Marion Nestle is a professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University. She is the author of Food Politics, Safe Food, What to Eat, and Pet Food Politics. More

Nestle also holds appointments as Professor of Sociology at NYU and Visiting Professor of Nutritional Sciences at Cornell. She is the author of three prize-winning books: Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (revised edition, 2007), Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety (2003), and What to Eat (2006). Her most recent book is Feed Your Pet Right: The Authoritative Guide to Feeding Your Dog and Cat. She writes the Food Matters column for The San Francisco Chronicle and blogs almost daily at Food Politics.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Health

From This Author

Just In