What's Really Killing Us

The New York Times Magazine returned to over-the-hill theories about sugar this weekend, but when it came to the risks of inactivity, it got things right

RTXVD6Y_wide.jpg

One of a group of "couch potatoes" attempting to set a new Guinness World Record for continuous television viewing by watching TV for more than 86 hours. Fred Prouser/Reuters


In these perilous times, one question that suddenly seems to have more resonance than most is posed by The New York Times Magazine this weekend: Is sugar toxic? The roughly 6,000 words addressing this quandary tempt readers with old data and even older theories only to reluctantly conclude that while eating sugar in the quantities we often do is not particularly good for us, neither is it suicidal. Put simply: Sugar is not toxic.

Having years ago written a book on obesity, I found this not the least surprising. Nor did physician Rudolph Leibel, a professor of diabetes research at Columbia University who has worked on the obesity problem and metabolic disease for over 25 years. When I spoke with him about the Times piece, he said: "People like to make special arguments about individual foods having specific impacts, but it's not the source of calories that is the primary problem. It's the number of calories that is the problem. Whether you eat too much sugar or too much fat or too much anything, you can become obese. People don't like to hear that, but it happens to be the truth."

To be fair, The New York Times Magazine is not all smoke and no fire on obesity this weekend. "Is Sitting a Lethal Activity?" answers the question it poses both succinctly and precisely: yes. Common sense should tell us that sitting for long periods of time is not what humans were designed to do. And common sense should also tell us that the Internet Age has made sitting an increasingly common posture. It turns out that obesity and its related ills will continue to rise until and unless WE more often rise.

Most of us know in our hearts that moving more and/or eating less remains the only successful prescription for weight loss, and for the control of obesity linked disease. Our hearts are right. Advice like this may not be a prescription for eyeball-stealing copy or best selling books. But it is the only honest prescription for good health.

Presented by

Ellen Ruppel Shell is the co-director of the Graduate Program in Science Journalism at Boston University. She is the author of Cheap: The High Cost of Discount Culture.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Health

From This Author

Just In