Three Cheers for the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act

Nestle_ChildNutrition_12-14_post.jpg

White House


President Obama has finally signed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (how do they name these things?)

The fact sheet (PDF) on the bill lists what it will do with the additional $4.5 billion in funding (over 10 years), among other actions:

    • Gives USDA the authority to set nutritional standards for all foods regularly sold in schools during the school day, including vending machines, the "a la carte" lunch lines, and school stores.

    • Provides additional funding to schools that meet updated nutritional standards for federally-subsidized lunches (this is the six cents per meal increase).

    • Helps communities establish local farm to school networks, create school gardens, and ensures that more local foods are used in the school setting.

    • Expands access to drinking water in schools, particularly during meal times.

    • Sets basic standards for school wellness policies including goals for nutrition promotion and education and physical activity.

    • Increases the number of eligible children enrolled in school meal programs by approximately 115,000 students ... Helps certify an average additional 4,500 students per year to receive school meals.

    • Allows more universal meal access for eligible students in high poverty communities.

The sticking point is the funding. It is to be "borrowed" from an authorized increase in funding for SNAP (food stamps). As I discussed earlier, enrollment in SNAP is rising rapidly, and so are its costs, so the loss of this increase will hurt.

In his signing speech, President Obama explained:

It's also important to note that while this bill is fully paid for, it won't add a dime to the deficit, some of the funding comes from rolling back a temporary increase in food stamp benefits—or SNAP as it's now called—starting in the fall of 2013. I know a number of members of Congress have expressed concerns about this offset being included in the bill, and I'm committed to working with them to restore these funds in the future.

He also said:

Not only am I very proud of the bill, but had I not been able to get this passed, I would be sleeping on the couch.

Mrs. Obama's Let's Move campaign inspired this bill and her leadership had much to do with its enactment. Cheers for this, at last!


This post also appears on foodpolitics.com.

Presented by

Marion Nestle is a professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University. She is the author of Food Politics, Safe Food, What to Eat, and Pet Food Politics. More

Nestle also holds appointments as Professor of Sociology at NYU and Visiting Professor of Nutritional Sciences at Cornell. She is the author of three prize-winning books: Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (revised edition, 2007), Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety (2003), and What to Eat (2006). Her most recent book is Feed Your Pet Right: The Authoritative Guide to Feeding Your Dog and Cat. She writes the Food Matters column for The San Francisco Chronicle and blogs almost daily at Food Politics.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book

Video

The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"

Video

This Japanese Inn Has Been Open For 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.

Video

What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.

More in Health

From This Author

Just In