Skip Navigation
Marion Nestle

Marion Nestle - Marion Nestle is professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University, and the author of Food Politics, Safe Food, What to Eat, and Pet Food Politics. More

Marion Nestle is Paulette Goddard Professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University. She also holds appointments as Professor of Sociology at NYU and Visiting Professor of Nutritional Sciences at Cornell. She is the author of three prize-winning books: Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (revised edition, 2007), Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety (2003), and What to Eat (2006). Her most recent book is Feed Your Pet Right: The Authoritative Guide to Feeding Your Dog and Cat. She writes the Food Matters column for The San Francisco Chronicle and blogs almost daily at Food Politics.

Study: Corn Syrup Actually Isn't the Same as Table Sugar

By Marion Nestle
Oct 27 2010, 8:53 AM ET Comment



Nestle_Fructose_10-26_post.jpg

mufan96/flickr


I've been saying for ages that the sugar composition of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is no different from that of table sugar (sucrose).

Oops. A new study in the journal Obesity actually measured the amounts and kinds of sugars in 23 kinds of HFCS-sweetened drinks (click here for the PDF).

The findings are summarized in a fact sheet (PDF):

    • The sugar content varied widely from amounts stated on labels. Some drinks had 15 percent less sugar than labeled, but others had as much as 30 percent more.

    • On average, the drinks had 18 percent more fructose than expected.

    • Several brands of sodas seemed to be made with HFCS that is 65 percent fructose, not 55 percent.

    • The average amount of fructose in the drinks was 59 percent.

The press release (full PDF here) points out one other finding. You know how everyone thinks Mexican Coca-Cola is so much more delicious than American Coke because it is made with table sugar (sucrose), not HFCS? Oops again. The investigators could not find any sucrose in the Coke, but did find plenty of glucose and fructose. This suggests that Mexican Coke is also made with HFCS (or it could also mean that the sucrose had been split into its constituent glucose and fructose).

To review the biochemistry: Sucrose is a double sugar of glucose and fructose bonded together. HFCS is glucose and fructose, separated. The sucrose bond is quickly split in the intestine and its glucose and fructose are the same as those in HFCS.

The metabolic problems that result from sugar intake are mostly due to the fructose content. Less is better for health. More is better for the soft drink industry, however. Fructose is sweeter than either glucose or sucrose, and sweetness is what sells sodas.

At most, HFCS is supposed to be 55 percent fructose, as compared to the 50 percent in table sugar. Most foods and drinks are supposed to be using HFCS that is 42 percent fructose. A percentage of 55 is not much different biologically than 50, which is why the assumption has been that there is no biologically meaningful difference between HFCS and table sugar. This study, if confirmed, means that this supposition may need some rethinking.

The study names the beverages that contain 65 percent fructose: Coke, Pepsi, Sprite. It identifies Dr. Pepper, Gatorade, and Arizona Iced Tea as containing close to 60 percent fructose.

If, in fact, the percentage of fructose is higher than advertised, it's another good reason to avoid sugar-sweetened beverages.


This post also appears on foodpolitics.com.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Lost Moral Perspective: The Absurd Way Partisans Assess 2012 Coverage Hey Voters: The Kill List Is What Matters
For the St. Louis Art Museum, a Legal Victory Raises Ethical Questions St. Louis Museum's Legal Victory Raises Ethical Questions
Infographic: The Average Person Gets 9,672 Minor Injuries in a Lifetime The Average Person Gets 9,672 Minor Injuries in a Lifetime
Why Do Asian Americans Have the Worst Long-Term Unemployment? Why Asian-Americans Have the Worst Long-Term Joblessness
Why Does the Laziest Country in Europe Work the Most? Why Does the Laziest Country in Europe Work the Most?

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Olympic Portraits, Part I: American Athletes

May 30, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)