Skip Navigation
Marion Nestle

Marion Nestle - Marion Nestle is professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University, and the author of Food Politics, Safe Food, What to Eat, and Pet Food Politics. More

Marion Nestle is Paulette Goddard Professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University. She also holds appointments as Professor of Sociology at NYU and Visiting Professor of Nutritional Sciences at Cornell. She is the author of three prize-winning books: Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (revised edition, 2007), Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety (2003), and What to Eat (2006). Her most recent book is Feed Your Pet Right: The Authoritative Guide to Feeding Your Dog and Cat. She writes the Food Matters column for The San Francisco Chronicle and blogs almost daily at Food Politics.

Dietary Guidelines: A Change We Can Believe in?

By Marion Nestle
Apr 27 2010, 8:20 AM ET Comment



nestle_foodpyramid_4-27_Sandy Austin_post.jpg

Sandy Austin/flickr


By congressional fiat, federal agencies must revise our country's Dietary Guidelines every five years. This is one of those years. The 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee has been meeting for a couple of years and is now nearly done.

Some unnamed person from the American Society of Nutrition must be attending meetings. The society's Health and Nutrition Policy Newsletter (April 22) provides a report.

From the sound of it, this committee is doing some tough thinking about how to deal with "overarching issues" that affect dietary advice:

    • The high prevalence of overweight and obesity among all Americans
    • The need to focus recommendations on added sugar, fats, refined carbohydrates, and sodium (rather than the obscure concept of "discretionary calories" used in the 2005 guidelines)
    • The benefits of shifting to plant-based, rather than meat-based, diets
    • The need to help individuals achieve physical activity guidelines
    • The need to change the food environment to help individuals meet the Dietary Guidelines

Applause, please, for this last one. It recognizes that individuals can't do it alone.

The committee's key findings and recommendations:

    • Vegetable protein and soy protein: Little evidence for unique health benefits, but there are benefits, such as added dietary fiber intake, from diets high in vegetable and soy proteins.
    • Carbohydrates: A consistent relationship between soft drink intake and weight gain. Overweight and obese children should reduce overall energy intake, especially from added sugars (and especially in the form of soft drinks and sugar-sweetened beverages).
    • Fats: Mono- and polyunsaturated fats, when replacing saturated fats, decrease the risks of heart disease and Type 2 diabetes in healthy adults. No benefit from increased intakes of omega-3 fatty acids above 250 to 300 milligrams a day. Adults should eat two servings of fish per week to obtain omega-3 fatty acids.
    • Sodium: Decrease sodium intake to 2,300 milligrams per 2,000-calorie diet to lower blood pressure in adults and children. Since 70 percent of the population is hypertensive, the goal for most individuals should be 1,500 milligrams per 2,000-calorie diet.
    • Potassium: Because higher intakes of potassium are associated with lower blood pressure, adults should increase intake to 4,700 milligrams daily.

Translation: More fruits and vegetables, fewer processed foods, and changes in the food environment to make it easier for everyone to follow this advice.

Next steps: The committee is supposed to complete its report by May 12 and send it to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health and Human Services. The agencies will post the report in June for public comment. Then, agency staffers will write the guidelines and publish them by the end of the year.

Historical note: Prior to 2005, the committee wrote the guidelines. I was on the 1995 committee and we drafted guidelines that the agencies hardly touched (except to tinker with the alcohol guideline, as I discussed in Food Politics and What to Eat). The guidelines have always been subject to political pressures, but with the agencies writing them, expect even more.

Let's hope the committee's sensible ideas will survive the process. I will be paying close attention to how the 2010 guidelines progress. Stay tuned.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

We Should Be in a race for Prevention, Not Cures We Should Race for
Prevention, Not Cures
Lost Moral Perspective: The Absurd Way Partisans Assess 2012 Coverage Hey Voters: The Kill List Is What Matters
Video of the Day: An Illinois Lawmaker's Epic Freak-Out Watch This: An Illinois Lawmaker's Epic Freak-Out
Why Are Democrats Losing the Wisconsin Recall? Why Are Democrats Losing the Wisconsin Recall?
Study of the Day: A Diet Loaded With sugar Makes Rats Dumber Study: Sugary Diets
May Dumb You Down

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

The Unreal World

May 31, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)