The comment about Jews is not as
off as this post makes it suggest. The idea that Jews don't criticize
each other in public is hardly contradicted by the fact that we do
little but criticize each other in private.
And the J street phenomenon is more notable for how long it has
taken to arrive and how much trouble it has maintaining support. The
great majority of jews in this country do not agree politically with
much that AIPAC is doing. Despite this there has been a Jewish
reluctance to criticize AIPAC because they represent Jews. You now have
Jewish Senators who agree with J-Street on the issues bowing to AIPAC
pressure to not attend a J-Street event precisely because J-street
attacks other Jews.
This is all rather silly because when Jews were a weak minority
there was some sense to this kind of banding together. But while even
more a minority, we are not at all weak at this point. And yet AIPAC
has largely been able to play on the reluctance of Jews to publicly
attack Jews to speak in the name of Jewish Americans while pushing a
view that a minority of Jewish Americans actually hold.
It is true that when we do criticize each other publicly we can be caustic. But that is jut our style.
Also, I'd be remiss if I didn't that mention that Goldbloghas beenon it ("it" being J Street v. AIPAC). Though not from the same angle as Lon. That's TNC--sowing discord in the Jewish community since, uhm, 2008.
Also, I'd be remiss if I didn't that mention that Goldblog has been on it ("it" being J Street v. AIPAC). Though not from the same angle as Lon. That's TNC--sowing discord in the Jewish community since, uhm, 2008.