The Walking Dead vs. Breaking Bad

Thoughts on the zombie thriller's Season 4 premiere, "30 Days Without an Accident"
AMC / The Atlantic

When we last witnessed the grim wasteland of AMC's post-apocalyptic drama, Rick and his fellow survivors had defeated the Governor in a shootout at the Governor's creepy, authoritarian facsimile of an all-American small town, Woodbury. Rick brought surviving children and old people from the town back to his group's home base, an abandoned prison, with the Governor and two of his henchmen still at large. As the new season opens this week, Rick is plowing the fields inside the prison gates while zombies amass outside. In an almost-nice touch, Rick takes on the rhythm of his labor as he blocks out the walkers' hideous rasping with some old-time Southern folk music on an MP3 player … which he's charged up by means the writers, I suppose, figure we don't really need to think about.

Roll the now-iconic title sequence, with its tense, cycling musical theme and frightening, cataract-y visuals. The Walking Dead is back.

This first scene captures maybe not everything but a lot of what's so compelling about the show—and alternately some of what's so frustrating. It's one of The Walking Dead's now-many striking vignettes showing what human resilience might look like if civilization were destroyed and replaced by a horrifying inversion of it. Rick, the show's burdened leader of a protagonist, starts in on a new day of a new quasi-normal life, which we know can only be temporary. We see him iterating a daily routine. We can imagine him taking some uncertain comfort from that. But we know it won't last. Nothing here does. We see him strike something with his hoe. It's a Colt 45 handgun, buried in the dirt. Rick barely pauses before removing the magazine from the gun, tossing both into his wheelbarrow, and getting on with his work. There's a air of vague mystery here. Maybe the gun means something. Maybe it's a clue of significant things yet to be discovered. But it's probably just an evocative souvenir of a gun battle at the prison last season. It's a standard play on The Walking Dead to build short scenes around details that remind us just how intense this apocalypse has been, and then just to move on. The show dwells and re-dwells. Which points to what I'm more and more convinced is the show's key weakness: It depends way too much on its basic premise.

To unpack that a little, let's put the opening scene in comparative context—granted, one that may make more sense to us in October 2013, when a non-trivial segment of the U.S. TV-watching population is working itself out of Breaking Bad withdrawal, than it will to TV historians in the future: If this were Breaking Bad, the 45 would mean something specific about where the story was going. True, Breaking Bad used foreshadowing in a particular, sometimes idiosyncratic, way. But it also generally didn't waste scenes on recalling for you what you already knew about the story. It drove the story forward, often relentlessly. That one-eyed teddy bear in the pool? That M60 machine gun in the trunk? These details told the viewer the story was going somewhere. And was it ever.

Breaking Bad brought the same purpose to character development that it brought to plotting. From Walt and Jesse to Hank or Lydia, its characters were distinct and specific; they spoke and acted specifically; they had specific purposes that interacted in specific ways, which made them and the story they were a part of real and compelling.

The Walking Dead struggles here. Last season, when Rick lost his mind and started hallucinating about his dead wife, he came back from it—a little more burdened, but that was that. In the Season 4 premiere, Rick meets a lone survivor who fears she's done such horrible things to get by that she never be able come back from as a human being. It turns out she doesn't. The encounter of course further burdens Rick. Hershel tells him not to forget he's come back himself. People can come back. These conversations sure do feel familiar. They happen over and over again.

Presented by

J.J. Gould is the editor of More

He has written for The Washington MonthlyThe American ProspectThe Moscow Times, The Chronicle Herald, and The European Journal of Political Theory. Gould was previously an editor at the Journal of Democracy, co-published by the Johns Hopkins University Press and the National Endowment for Democracy, and a lecturer in history and politics at Yale University. He has also worked with McKinsey & Company's New York-based Knowledge Group on global public- and social-sector development and on the economics of carbon-emissions reduction. Gould has a B.A. in history from McGill University in Montreal, an M.Sc. from the London School of Economics, and a Ph.D. in politics from Yale. He is from Nova Scotia.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Entertainment

Just In