The Sheer Absurdity of Favoring Eli Manning Over Peyton Manning

The Giants' Justin Tuck says he'd rather have Eli lead his team than Peyton because Eli "has more Super Bowls." Nice sentiment from a teammate, but a silly choice.
AP /

This Sunday afternoon’s matchup between the Denver Broncos and New York Giants at MetLife Stadium—or “Manning Bowl III,” as the football press is calling it—pits the brothers Peyton Manning and Eli Manning, the teams’ respective quarterbacks, against each other. The Broncos vs. the Giants aren’t on the 2014 schedule; Peyton, who will be 38 next March, may not play much longer, and preseason odds indicate that face-off in February, in the same stadium, for the Super Bowl is unlikely—so this weekend’s matchup may well be one of fans’ last chances to see the Mannings battle for superiority on the field.

The Big Brother vs. Little Brother debate has been going on for a while among fans, sportswriters, and even athletes themselves—and much of it can’t be quantified. As reported by the New York Daily News on Wednesday, Giants defensive end Justin Tuck weighed in just this week on who he’d rather have leading his team, and he made his argument simple: “Eli has been in the league less years and had more Super Bowls.” (He also added, “You’ll notice that I didn’t say Eli was a better quarterback than Peyton. I just said I will go with Eli.” And that’s the way a teammate should feel.)

There are, of course, arguments for Eli: One, like Tuck said, he’s won two Super Bowls to Peyton’s one. Does that, I wonder, create some tension at the Manning household when they sit down for Thanksgiving dinner? When Peyton asks Eli to pass the collard greens, does the little brother flash his second Super Bowl ring? And two, Eli is 8-3 in postseason games while Peyton is 9-11. In fact, before Eli won his first ring in 2008, already the rap on Peyton was that he couldn’t win the big one. One writer even called him “The Picasso of Choke Artists,” and Peyton was a good enough sport to spoof his reputation when he hosted Saturday Night Live in 2007.

How justified is that reputation, though? Nearly all the other statistical evidence of quarterback excellence tilts in Peyton’s favor.

Over the course of their careers, their regular season stats aren’t even close. In 225 games dating back to 1998, Peyton’s teams (the Indianapolis Colts through 2010, and the Broncos since then) are 155-70 (a .689 win-loss percentage), while Eli, who has played every game since his 2004 rookie season for the Giants, has led his team to a record of 78-58 (.574).

Almost any statistic you choose could prove the same point. Pass completion percentage? Peyton’s is .652, Eli’s .587. Interception percentage? 1.8 percent for Peyton, 3.3 percent for Eli. Touchdown passes? Peyton, with 443, is second on the all-time list, behind only Brett Favre, and has led the league in scoring throws three times. Eli has 215 and has never led the league’s passers in TDs.

In the most important of all passing stats, yards per throw, Peyton has averaged 7.7 to Eli’s 7.1, and in overall QB rating it’s no contest—Big Bro, 96.0; Baby Bro, 82.9. And in their two previous head-to-head meetings, Peyton has completed 45 of 67 for 531 yards while Eli has connected on 33 of 58 for 408 yards; Peyton’s team won both games 26-21 in 2006 and 38-14 in 2010.

Importantly, though, there’s only so much a quarterback can do, and not all stats—arguably no stats—reflect just the quarterback’s performance. In baseball, you can say with some certainty that Miguel Cabrera or Mike Trout are superiors to other hitters by looking at their on-base and slugging averages, which are solely the products of their individual effort. But all QB numbers are impacted not just by the passer’s ability but his teammates’ performance in pass blocking, running, and even special teams and defense. The QB can do nothing to impact his team’s defense except control the ball on offense and limit the number of plays the opposing team can run. For instance, I’d argue that in the Broncos’ loss this past January to the Baltimore Ravens, Peyton did just about all a quarterback can do, putting up 35 points and passing for 290 yards and 3 TDs. One would have to give most of the credit for that passing offense to Peyton and pretty much let him off the hook for the fact that the Ravens, who went on the win the Super Bowl, won the game by scoring 38 points.

Presented by

Allen Barra writes about sports for the Wall Street Journal and His next book is Mickey and Willie--The Parallel Lives of Baseball's Golden Age.

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Entertainment

Just In