'Accidental Racist' Is Not a Joke

Day 2 of our Brad Paisley/LL Cool-induced national argument

Ellen DeGeneres had Brad Paisley on her show today to talk in part about "Accidental Racist," his very-strange, very-controversial track with LL Cool J. He mouthed some stuff about talk radio and Hollywood screwing up the conversation on race, and then, as Jezebel narrates:

Ellen prompted: "You're basically saying..." And Paisley replied: "I don't know."

Pretty much. But despite how Paisley makes it sound, it's not like this is a harmless song pointing out how "the Mason-Dixon needs some fixing"—it itself is part of what needs fixing. David Graham here at The Atlantic got into the particular, not-than-uncommon insanity of the track's references to the Confederate Flag, and as Ta-Nehisi Coates put it on Twitter, "This entire song is an argument for Black History for, like, the next 10000000 years."

But the best conversation I've seen about the song, and what exactly is screwed-up about it, happened on Tumblr between the writers Nick Murray, Alexander Ostroff, and Rahawa Haile. Murray has a comprehensive and fascinating overview of Paisley's career and how the corniness of "Accidental Racist" fits in, but Haile gets to the core about why it's not the kind of thing that can just be laughed off or chalked up as a novelty:

My problem isn't the Skynyrd shirt, but rather the suggestion that the perpetuation of racial intolerance in today's society is exclusively the product of past harm, so let's move on. The notion is infuriating. There is so, so, so much active hatred in this country against people of color. There is no "I'm just a white man." It isn't just the confederate flag on his shirt. I am not just a listener.

I am an Eritrean-American woman from Florida, and I hate that I had to write about what's ultimately an atrocious song (context aside) because my largely white music critic friends are cringing in silence or downplaying this monumental failure at reconciliation between the races.

"Accidental Racist" is racial mansplaining, whether you like it or not.

It's worth reading that conversation in full, here. And, of course, never listening to the song again.

Presented by

Spencer Kornhaber is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he covers pop culture and music. He was previously an editor at Patch.com and a staff writer at OC Weekly. He has written for Spin, The AV Club, and RollingStone.com.

Does This Child Need Marijuana?

Dravet Syndrome is a severe form of epilepsy that affects children. Could marijuana oils alleviate their seizures?

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Does This Child Need Marijuana?

Inside a family's fight to use marijuana oils to treat epilepsy


A Miniature 1950s Utopia

A reclusive artist built this idealized suburb to grapple with his painful childhood memories.


Why Principals Matter

Nadia Lopez didn't think anybody cared about her school. Then the Internet heard her story.


A History of Contraception

In the 16th century, men used linen condoms laced shut with ribbons.


'A Music That Has No End'

In Spain, a flamenco guitarist hustles to make a modest living.

More in Entertainment

Just In