The 'Jersey Shore' Curse: Why MTV's Smart New Show Is Probably Doomed

More

Underemployed is the network's best scripted drama in years, but the channel's fixation on increasingly outlandish reality TV may have killed audience appetite for programs like it.

underemployed.jpg
MTV

Ever since Lena Dunham's Girls premiered to the alternately rapturous and outraged reactions upon which zeitgeists are made, networks have been scrambling to find "a voice of a generation" of their own. Just last week, Comedy Central ordered a pilot of Broad City, a comedy web series about a pair of friends trying to make it in New York. A few days later, NBC announced plans to develop a sitcom based on the Tumblr blog "Fuck! I'm in My Twenties." But MTV must have worked fast: Its version, Underemployed, premieres Tuesday night.

The comedic drama follows five college friends' post-collegiate lives in Chicago, playing up the incompatibility between these creative types' lofty ambitions and the bleak career prospects that now await most newly graduated humanities majors. A bookish and sexually innocent academic achiever takes a job in a doughnut shop, complete with a humiliating doughnut-shaped beret. An idealistic conservationist must beg his polluting businessman father for a corporate job after his ex-girlfriend surfaces, nine months pregnant with his baby. Glossier and more self-serious than Girls, Underemployed's warmhearted portrayal of these characters and their relationships (not to mention its appreciably more diverse cast) makes it more than just a crass attempt to cash in on TV's vogue for aimless young adults flailing in urban settings.

As promising as the show is, though, it may already be doomed. Drama series have long been a dicey proposition for MTV, and most of its recent attempts at scripted programming that aims to realistically portray young people lives' haven't fared well. Although Underemployed could turn out to be an anomaly like Awkward, a remarkably smart and punchy teen comedy that will air its third season in 2013, its earnestness may consign it to a fate more similar to last year's notorious flop, Skins. The heavily hyped American adaptation of a risqué British teen drama generated plenty of controversy but couldn't attract enough viewers to survive past its first season. I Just Want My Pants Back, which followed the personal and professional lives of 20-somethings in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, suffered from a similar lack of interest.

Conservative critics see no difference between these shows and Jersey Shore or The Real World, characterizing all of the above as morally bankrupt depictions of debauched youth. In fact, the Parents Television Council's campaigns against MTV reality shows look downright tame in comparison to its outrage at Skins, which it branded "the most dangerous television show for children that we have ever seen." But in their outrage at any depiction of sex or drugs, regardless of context, groups like the PTC miss the truly worrisome difference between the network's scripted and unscripted series. Skins took young people and their problems seriously, while Jersey Shore positions its cast members as empty-headed clowns. In yet another of so-called reality TV's many ironies, MTV's alarmingly unrealistic reality programming has so fully imposed its hard-partying, fist-pumping, ambition-free vision of youth that it's turned its entire audience away from more universal teen and young-adult narratives of self-discovery. After years of watching famous-for-being-famous alcoholics fight and hook up outside the context of any significant storylines or stakes, MTV's viewers seem to have become unreceptive to multilayered characters whose struggles bear more resemblance to their own.

This youth-culture identity crisis has, of course, been a long time coming. It's just taken MTV's renewed enthusiasm for scripted series to reveal the extent to which an endless supply of exploitative reality programming has shaped its audience's tastes.

After years of watching famous-for-being-famous alcoholics fight and hook up with no storylines or stakes, viewers seem to have become unreceptive to characters whose struggles resemble their own.

Although it's impossible to pinpoint when exactly MTV's portrayal of teens and 20-somethings shifted from insightful and sympathetic to frivolous, the fall 2003 premiere of Rich Girls is an important moment. The year after the network set Daria Morgendorffer and Jane Lane free from high school, it introduced us to a new pair of teenagers: Tommy Hilfiger's daughter Ally and her best friend, Jaime Gleicher. Their real-life social schemes and privileged problems didn't provide much action, and Rich Girls only aired 10 episodes, but the combination of fascination and derision its characters inspired became a staple of MTV reality shows.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Judy Berman is the deputy editor of Flavorwire. Her work has appeared in The Los Angeles Times, Slate, and The Believer.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

What Is a City?

Cities are like nothing else on Earth.


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Entertainment

Just In