Who Cares About the Red Sox Collapse?

fetter_collapse.jpg

Reuters


Forgive me Red Sox Nation, but I can't get overly worked up by the Old Towne Team's so-called "epic collapse" that has cost them the nine-game lead they held over Tampa Bay on September 2 and dropped them into a dead heat with the Rays for the American League "wild card" playoff spot going into the last day of the regular season, with each team having one game left to play.

And I write as a Fenway alumnus who suffered though the 1967 World Series loss to the Cardinals (redeemed as it was in large part , of course, by the very improbability of the "Impossible Dream" season that brought the Sox from ninth place the year before to their first pennant since 1946), the 1975 defeat by Cincinnati's heavily favored Big Red Machine (again redeemed in part by the epic win in Game Six on Calton Fisk's 12th inning homer long after the MTA had stopped running and we had to walk home) , and the 1986 Bill Buckner debacle (entirely unredeemed) . But if the Sox fall short this year, it will be different.

The Sox and the Rays are, after all, fighting it out for second place. For that is what a "wild card" berth in the playoffs (I , for one, can't stand to say "post-season") in a sport that derived much of its greatest appeal from the six months drama of a do-or-die pennant race in which there would be no second—and half a year's efforts by the players and investment by the fans would hang in the balance as the season came to a abrupt and unforgiving end. The stakes were huge and the exhilaration and the pain equally intense. Under the current setup (and indeed with the prospect of increasing the number of wild card slots in an expanding playoff system in the future) so much of that is gone. Who, after all, would now care if Bobby Thomson's 1951 "shot heard around the world" off Ralph Branca had been about determining home-field advantage, with both Thomson's Giants and the Dodgers both headed into the "post season?"

When the "wild card" was introduced in 1995, Boston fans complained that the new dispensation unfairly allowed the Yankees to make it into the playoffs along with the division winning Red Sox. As the sole prize now attainable, its value has evidently shot up. But whether the Red Sox win in the end or not, and forgive me for saying this, the baseball we grew up with is the loser.

Why we shouldn't pay attention to Boston and Tampa Bay's fight for second place

Presented by

Henry D. Fetter is the author of Taking on the Yankees: Winning and Losing in the Business of Baseball and has written widely about the business and politics of sports. More

Henry D. Fetter is the author of Taking on the Yankees: Winning and Losing in the Business of Baseball (WW Norton). He has written about the business and politics of sports, the American left, Jewish and Israeli history, and legal affairs for publications including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, the Times Literary Supplement, the Journal of Sport History, Israel Affairs, The Public Interest, American Communist History, The National Pastime, and the Encyclopedia of American Jewish History, and his work has appeared in several baseball history anthologies.

His article "Revising the Revisionists: Walter O' Malley, Robert Moses and the End of the Brooklyn Dodgers" was awarded the Kerr History Prize for the best article published in 2008 in the journal New York History; an earlier version of that article was presented at the Columbia University symposium "Robert Moses: New Perspectives on the Master Builder" (March 2007) and received a McFarland-SABR Baseball Research Award. He is the recipient of research grants from the Society for American Baseball Research and the Harry S. Truman Library Institute.

Fetter is a graduate of Harvard Law School and also holds degrees in history from Harvard College and the University of California, Berkeley. A native New Yorker, he attended his first major league baseball game at Brooklyn's Ebbets Field on Memorial Day 1955 and some years later followed the Dodgers to Los Angeles where he has practiced business and entertainment litigation for the past 30 years.

Never Tell People How Old They Look

Age discrimination affects us all. Who cares about youth? James Hamblin turns to his colleague Jeffrey Goldberg for advice.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Never Tell People How Old They Look

Age discrimination affects us all. James Hamblin turns to a colleague for advice.

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

Video

Pittsburgh: 'Better Than You Thought'

How Steel City became a bikeable, walkable paradise

Video

A Four-Dimensional Tour of Boston

In this groundbreaking video, time moves at multiple speeds within a single frame.

Video

Who Made Pop Music So Repetitive? You Did.

If pop music is too homogenous, that's because listeners want it that way.

More in Entertainment

Just In