Porn, HIV, and the Great Condom Debate

More

> condoms_William B Plowman_post.jpg

William B. Plowman/Getty Images


Last week, the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation announced that an unidentified porn actor—known, as of this date, only as "Patient Zero"—had tested positive for HIV. Since then, several film companies have temporarily shut down, an unknown number of performers are on "quarantine" while being tested, and rumors about the identity of the actor and the extent of the situation have been circulating fast. This is not a first; an unidentified female performer was diagnosed with HIV in June 2009, and in 2004, actor Darren James contracted the disease and transmitted it to three fellow performers before being diagnosed. The latest news has renewed a long-standing cry: Why are performers having unprotected sex in the first place? Why aren't condoms mandatory? Shouldn't it be illegal to put people's lives at risk?

The issue of condom use in pornography has been a subject of heated debate for a long time. California state labor laws do currently require companies to protect their workers from exposure to blood-borne pathogens, and state officials maintain that condoms are already required under those laws. Meanwhile the industry maintains that it has the ability to self-police and to provide adequate protection for its workers. AIM provides monthly testing to performers, and keeps records that allow producers to check on the status of their actors, as well as logging on-screen partners to make tracking the disease easier. The system, described by director Ernest Greene as "informal but stringently observed" in Los Angeles, doesn't have the power to force HIV positive performers to stop working, or to control hiring decisions, but non-compliance affects an actor's ability to find work. Still, it's not foolproof: The HIV positive actress of last year apparently made a film with an expired test result in the brief window between being tested and receiving her diagnosis.

And so, the fight is on. LA County itself rejected a proposal to enforce condom use in February, citing limited resources and an insufficient ability to monitor work sites. Although officials supported condom use, they said that statewide legislation was the best solution. CAL-OSHA formed an advisory panel to explore the possibility of strengthening legislation that requires condom use; its initial pronouncements were called a "con job" by Carnal Nation, which also said mandatory condom use would effectively shut down the porn industry.

Mandatory condom use might not eliminate pornography, but, according to some, it might well create new health and safety risks. I spoke via e-mail with friend and Fleshbot editor Lux Alptraum, who has written about this issue in the past. She pointed out that, even if California mandates condom usage in pornography, there's a pretty easy solution for companies that don't want to use condoms. Hint: It involves not making pornography in California.

"If California were to mandate condoms in porn," she wrote, "companies would likely just move to a different state, or even to a different country—there's quite a bit of porn (even American porn) produced in Hungary, where I highly doubt condom use in porn would ever be regulated."

Moving out of California, Alptraum notes, "would make the industry harder to monitor and possibly less safe for performers." In this, she's backed by adult industry journalist Gram Ponante, who told me that "the enforcement of such legislation would only kill the 'legitimate' adult industry and send any other would-be pornographers underground to shoot in an utterly-unregulated and unenforceable black market."

Of course, there's the question of why condom use is being resisted. In straight pornography, Alptraum says, one of the key problems is that it hurts profits. But it's not as simple as that. Alptraum also points out that sex sessions in pornography can last longer and be rougher than more informal, off-the-record sex, which makes the efficacy of the condoms themselves questionable. Performers such as Nina Hartley and Belladonna have spoken against condom use, on the grounds that condoms hurt, make porn shoots difficult, and can even injure vaginal or anal tissue.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Sady Doyle is a freelance writer based in New York City. She blogs at Tiger Beatdown. More

Sady Doyle is a writer living in New York. She has contributed to Salon's Broadsheet, the American Prospect, the Guardian's Comment is Free, and Feministe. She blogs at Tigerbeatdown.com.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

This Short Film Skewers Hollywood, Probably Predicts Disney's Next Hit

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

How Will Climate Change Affect Cities?

Urban planners and environmentalists predict the future of city life.

Video

The Inner Life of a Drag Queen

A short documentary about cross-dressing, masculinity, identity, and performance

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Entertainment

Just In