|
|
« Previous Coates | Next Coates » |
|
In Defense Of Neo-Sherlock
By
Yglesias on Holmes:
Some people feel that this action-oriented version of Holmes is untrue to the original. I think this is wrong. The print Holmes is clearly described as an expert singlestick fighter and accomplished barenuckle boxer. He gets into fisticuffs and always wins. Hand-to-hand combat is never the feature of Conan Doyle's stories because it wouldn't be interesting to read a detailed account of beating a guy up with a walking stick. But bringing more emphasis to this kind of thing is exactly what a screen adaptation of a well-known print character should be for--elements of the character that are de-emphasized by the print medium are rightly brought into sharper focus for a movie.I don't know, I've read some pretty bracing action scenes in the fantasy genre. I don't really object to Sherlock Holmes as an action hero--I just think that there's a lot of this sort of thing. But then, maybe not enough.
Presented by













.jpg)














Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus