The uncertain future of dictionaries

To me, the future of the dictionary industry doesn't look much brighter than the future of the American auto industry. To be sure, people learning a language will continue to need dictionaries. And specialized dictionaries will remain useful. The Oxford English Dictionary, for a case in point, lays out the entire history of English before our eyes; it's a cultural treasure. (If, however, it were required to make money for its owners -- as most dictionaries now are -- not even the first volume of the first edition would have made it into print.)  

In a recent thread, Jesse Sheidlower and I began discussing dictionaries and what they're good for. Jesse is editor at large at the Oxford English Dictionary, and as you might imagine, he considers dictionaries invaluable. My job includes fielding regular people's questions about language, so I'm constantly discovering new things that people wish dictionaries did, but they don't. I don't mean to suggest that lexicographers are particularly lazy or sloppy. But it seems to me that they invest a lot of hard work in things users don't need or want.

More after the jump.

In my experience, people want standard dictionaries:

(1) To rule on whether or not a given word exists,

(2) To tell them how to spell, pronounce, and use words in the standard, appropriate-to-use-during-a-job-interview way,

(3) And to clear up obscure points about certain words.

For different but definite reasons, though, the guidance dictionaries give people on any of these points is unreliable. I'll be glad to explain why I say this -- at least, I will be glad to if anyone asks politely.

What's more, I'm willing to admit that my complaint is unfair -- as if I were complaining about my car that it can't fly. It wasn't designed to fly! The difference is that most people don't buy a car expecting that it can fly -- or imagine that the car is flying when it isn't. 

What dictionaries are really good at is describing established words with one spelling, one pronunciation, relatively few meanings, and no level-of-language issues (as in, for instance, are people likely to find it offensive?). But that's not what people who use dictionaries usually want to know. 

So now that -- as I said in the earlier thread and Jesse seconded -- all of us Internet users can find out for ourselves much of what we do want to know, dictionaries' days may be numbered.  
Presented by

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well. Bestselling author Mark Bittman teaches James Hamblin the recipe that everyone is Googling.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus


How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.


Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.


The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.


Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.


Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses


Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Entertainment

Just In