|
D.C. Dispatch
May 22, 2007
Iraq doesn't sound like a kitchen-table issue, but it's what voters are most worried about.
Intensely Anti-WarPoliticians talk about "kitchen-table" issues. Republican presidential candidate Jim Gilmore, for example, has mentioned "ordinary people around the kitchen table, concerned about high taxation, the high cost of living, and the challenges of meeting their obligations." Are those the kinds of issues that are going to drive the 2008 campaign? This month, a CNN/Opinion Research poll asked people what issues will be "extremely important" to their vote for president. Iraq was the only issue that a majority (51 percent) deemed extremely important. Iraq doesn't sound like a kitchen-table issue, and Republicans hope that it won't be. But it is what voters are worried about. If there's a sleeper issue for 2008, it's likely to be health care. What's driving it is the rapidly rising cost of health insurance for those currently insured and for their employers, as well as the growing number of uninsured Americans. Forty-three percent of the public said that health care will be extremely important to their vote. The economy is supposed to be the ultimate kitchen-table issue. Republicans have reason to hope that it is in 2008. In the CNN/Opinion Research poll, 61 percent of Americans said that economic conditions in the country are good, despite rising gasoline prices and falling home prices. But this campaign may not be about "the economy, stupid." Only one-third of respondents called the economy an extremely important issue. We hear a lot about illegal immigration and abortion, but fewer than a third of Americans rated either issue extremely important (31 percent in the case of illegal immigration, 27 percent in the case of abortion). Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., got it just about right when he said, "Other than Iraq and health care, there's no issue on the minds of the American people today other than maybe gas prices and then immigration." But to say that voters care about an issue is only part of the story. You also have to ask whether those who care are more likely to be on one side of the issue or the other. Take Iraq. Nearly two-thirds of Americans oppose the war. But do they care about the issue as much as the war's supporters do? In fact, they care more: 58 percent of those who oppose the war say that the issue will be extremely important to their vote. Only 38 percent of war supporters feel that way. The war critics don't just have the numbers, they also have the intensity. That is why Republicans are feeling pressure on Iraq. How long can GOP lawmakers continue to support President Bush on the war? A group of moderate Republicans warned the president that they could hold on only until September, when Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, is due to report on the war's progress. Republicans have to be concerned when they hear Vice President Cheney say, as he did last week in Baghdad, "We didn't get elected to worry just about the fate of the Republican Party. Our mission is to do everything we can to prevail ... against one of the most evil opponents we've ever faced." On the campaign trail, Democratic presidential candidates have begun talking about universal health insurance. Nearly two-thirds of Americans favor such a program "even if this would require higher taxes," according to the CNN/Opinion Research poll. Moreover, those who want a national health insurance program care about the issue a lot more: 51 percent say that health care is extremely important, while only 30 percent of opponents feel the same way. A solid majority of Americans—80 percent—favors allowing illegal immigrants who have been living in the United States for a number of years to stay and apply for citizenship if they have a job and pay any overdue taxes. Critics call that amnesty. The critics may be far fewer in number, but they have intensity on their side. They are much more likely to say that the immigration issue will be extremely important to their vote (47 percent) than are people who favor a path to citizenship (28 percent). That's why politicians pay so much attention to letters and e-mails, and to voters who show up at town halls. Politicians want to know who really cares about an issue. Intensity matters. William Schneider is the Cable News Network's senior political analyst. He is also a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., and a contributing editor for the Los Angeles Times, National Journal, and The Atlantic Monthly. His column appears every week in National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.
Discuss this article in Post & Riposte. More from National Journal |
Search
Recent commentary from National JournalInnocents in PrisonMany thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country. The Candidates' Four Detention CampsDeciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought. Crowd ControlEverybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing. Democratic SlugfestAn exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen. Shortsighted on JudgesSenate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi. Beyond Trade Adjustment AssistanceWorkers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons. The Poverty CandidatesJohn Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda. Are the Democrats Serious?Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege. Of Church and StateReligion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division. Flying Blind in a Red-Tape BlizzardBased on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years. |







