D.C. Dispatch February 6, 2007

Barack Obama has everything going for him except what he really needs right now: a massive media disaster.

by William Powers

from National Journal

What Goes Up

Article Tools

E-mail Article
Printer Format

Barack Obama has everything going for him except what he really needs right now: a massive media disaster.

Presidential campaigns perform a constant tightrope act in the media. They crave the attention but live in fear of bad press. The latter comes in two basic varieties: 1) a scandal based on some damaging new revelation about the candidate's private or professional life (think Bill Clinton's draft evasion, or Gary Hart's Monkey Business); 2) an unfortunate media performance, where the candidate looks weak, stupid, or just silly (Michael Dukakis in the tank, or Gerald Ford's 1976 howler, "There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe").

In olden times, when the way a politician came across in the media was deemed synonymous with who he really was, both kinds of stories were candidate-killers. When Democratic front-runner Edmund Muskie choked up in front of reporters in 1972, he was finished. And it was all downhill for Edward Kennedy in 1980 after he fumbled his response to the simple question: "Senator, why do you want to be president?"

The world is very different now. Two things happened in the 1990s to change the way that media disasters affect presidential campaigns. First was the explosion of news outlets, the ramping up of competition, and the resulting tabloidization of news itself. As scandal became routinized, the public grew both accustomed to it and skeptical about its value.

The second factor was Bill Clinton, who, for better or worse, showed again and again that media firestorms are no longer instrinsically fatal. The man survived dozens of them and lived to play Elder Statesman. Consider all of the negative media that both Clintons attracted in the '90s, then look at Hillary's poll numbers. This is the world we live in.

If you step back from the daily news cycle and watch the dynamic over time, it's even possible to argue that a big fat media mess can actually be good for a candidate. It's a troubling, downright cynical notion, but it plays out before us with startling regularity.

Five years ago, when John Edwards was in the role that Obama is now playing—the Pure One, the do-no-wrong ingenue—I laid out in this space an argument that political stars now emerge in the media in much the same way as movie stars, passing through several predictable stages. First the figure is introduced to us through scattered media appearances and "mentions." Next we get to know him on a deeper level through a moving personal story, such as the remembered loss of a loved one.

Then comes Validation, in which the subject is declared a big-leaguer in a Vanity Fair/cover-of-Newsweek sort of way. Our famous one then becomes the subject of "think pieces" interpreting his candidacy as an embodiment of our times. These are followed by "meta" stories that wonder in suitably contrarian fashion whether there's not something absurd in all of the hype.

The next stage is The Flop or Downturn. It happens to all major movie stars, either at the box office or the rehab center. And now it also happens to presidential candidates. John Edwards had his flop when he did Meet the Press in 2002 and was laid ignominiously low by Tim Russert.

Of course, Edwards eventually recovered. And that's the point. Ours is a culture of recovery. Ups are worthless without a few downs. Every candidate needs to have some kind of a very public downswing from which he or she can rebound. It's an ineluctable part of becoming a modern public figure. It gives the whole story texture and depth, qualities demanded by a culture accustomed to thinking of its idols in novelistic fashion. Hillary Rodham Clinton's ups and downs serve her well for this reason—in the conventional wisdom, she's a survivor.

Media disasters don't always end happily. If they come too late (think Dean Scream) or are dealt with ineptly (John Kerry's Iraq joke), all bets are off. In any case, Obama's reversal is almost certainly coming. Journalists are combing his life right now, looking for the stink bomb that will turn his rise into a fall. When it comes, it will not be pretty. But it will not be the end of the story, either.

William Powers is a columnist for National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.

Article Tools

E-mail Article
Printer Format

Discuss this article in Post & Riposte.

More from National Journal

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter.

Recent commentary from National Journal

August 7, 2007

Innocents in Prison

Many thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country.

August 7, 2007

The Candidates' Four Detention Camps

Deciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought.

August 7, 2007

Crowd Control

Everybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing.

August 7, 2007

Democratic Slugfest

An exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen.

July 31, 2007

Shortsighted on Judges

Senate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi.

July 31, 2007

Beyond Trade Adjustment Assistance

Workers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons.

July 31, 2007

The Poverty Candidates

John Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda.

July 24, 2007

Are the Democrats Serious?

Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege.

July 24, 2007

Of Church and State

Religion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division.

July 17, 2007

Flying Blind in a Red-Tape Blizzard

Based on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years.


Name

Address 1

Address 2

City

State Zip

Email

Atlantic Voices

The Surge Caused Everything! Read more

24 July 2008 02:42 A.M.

Thought of the Day Read more

23 July 2008 10:50 P.M.

Obama In Berlin Read more

23 July 2008 3:13 P.M.

Gored! Read more

23 July 2008 1:17 P.M.

No Orleans Read more

23 July 2008 5:54 P.M.

I'm not there, so I can't say so first hand, but... Read more

23 July 2008 11:15 P.M.

Marc Ambinder, Blogging Hero Read more

23 July 2008 8:31 P.M.

The CBO on Fannie and Freddie Read more

24 July 2008 08:23 A.M.