D.C. Dispatch December 19, 2006

'Tis the season for ringing the holiday bells instead of sounding the death knell for journalism.

by William Powers

Fa La La La La

from National Journal

Article Tools

email E-mail Article
print Printer Format

Christmas often brings on the blues, and nowhere more so than in the news business. Take a look around the media landscape and what do you see? Darkness and ruination. Circulation and ratings are down, not to mention profits. Quality is giving way to crap. So says the bah-humbug conventional wisdom.

But like George Bailey on the bridge in It's a Wonderful Life, we often fail to see the upside of things. Every unpleasant thought the culture is having right now about the media can be turned on its head. It's all a matter of attitude, of how you frame things:

Hostility. There's a lot of ugliness right now between the press and the White House. In the midst of the recent contretemps about whether Iraq is having a "civil war," New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller went on National Public Radio's "On the Media" and said: "In the constellation of things that we have to do that deal with Iraq, including, you know, keeping a large number of correspondents safe and making sure that the story gets well covered and figuring out what the geniuses in Washington propose to do about the war, the discussion of whether or not we use the words 'civil war' or not to describe it, you know, don't rank high on the list of priorities." Ouch. The bit about "the geniuses" tells you all you need to know about current Bush-Times relations, and that more or less represents how things are going between the administration and the media at large. But this tension has a real upside for news consumers. The days when much of the daily Washington coverage of the war had an inert, embedded quality are long gone. Emboldened by the administration's defeat at the polls last month, the news business is on the warpath about the war, as the "civil war" turn made clear. Acrimony can be salutary.

Leaks. The public doesn't much like them, according to the polls. The administration finds them treasonous. White House Counselor Dan Bartlett called the leak of the memo from National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley "egregious." When leaks lead to messy, impenetrable scandals like the Valerie Plame business, it's bad news for the media's image. But when the country is in a losing war and everyone is still trying to figure out why, leaks can be just what the doctor ordered. The more that reporters air out this debacle, the better. For the media, and the country at large, this wave of leaks looks like redemption.

Celebrification. Britney Spears makes headlines every day. Her name was just declared the most-searched term on Yahoo! in 2006, the fifth time that's happened in the past six years (at least news outlets are not responsible for that). But what you might not have noticed is that celebrity coverage is not as slavish as it used to be. Much of it looks and feels like a morality play. Think of the Mel Gibson/Michael Richards scandals. Or of Spears herself, whose recent exhibitionist adventures were covered with widespread jaundice. "Britney Keeps Making Fame Look Sleazy," said The Sacramento Bee, succinctly. Celebrity coverage is no longer all softball all the time. This is the age of TMZ.com, and the most sought-after celeb photo is the mug shot.

Dying Newspapers. Well, yes. Every day there's fresh evidence of rigor mortis. But every day also brings news of plutocrats who want to buy the flailing newspapers and revive them. Speaking of celebrities, one Hollywood figure is angling to purchase what is arguably the most endangered of the great newspapers, The Los Angeles Times. "I'm not interested in buying things simply to make money. I'm interested in doing something that's going to be valuable for the community, where I can make a difference," entertainment billionaire David Geffen told The Wall Street Journal, channeling the most ardent owner fantasies of desperate journalists everywhere. "Los Angeles needs a better newspaper," he said.

"I would devote my resources to building a first-class national newspaper."

Come down off that bridge, people. It's almost Christmas and, even in the media, nothing is really as bad as it seems.

William Powers is a columnist for National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.

Article Tools

email E-mail Article
Printer Format
Share

More from National Journal

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter.

 

Recent Commentary from National Journal

August 7, 2007

Innocents in Prison

Many thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country.

August 7, 2007

The Candidates' Four Detention Camps

Deciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought.

August 7, 2007

Crowd Control

Everybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing.

August 7, 2007

Democratic Slugfest

An exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen.

July 31, 2007

Shortsighted on Judges

Senate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi.

July 31, 2007

Beyond Trade Adjustment Assistance

Workers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons.

July 31, 2007

The Poverty Candidates

John Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda.

July 24, 2007

Are the Democrats Serious?

Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege.

July 24, 2007

Of Church and State

Religion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division.

July 17, 2007

Flying Blind in a Red-Tape Blizzard

Based on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years.


Name

Address 1

Address 2

City

State Zip

Email