D.C. Dispatch November 7, 2006

Polls get all the attention because we are a numbers-obsessed culture. But there's another conduit for America's moods

by William Powers

from National Journal

Viva, Vox Pop

Article Tools

E-mail Article
Printer Format

There's one thing we can predict with absolute certainty: In the waning hours of Tuesday evening, some journalist somewhere will report that "the American people have spoken." Yet if you've been following this election, you know that the people have already spoken—over and over and over, through news outlets and their incessant polls.

Polls get all the attention because we are a numbers-obsessed culture. But there's another conduit for America's moods that plays a major role in the way reporters frame a big election, although it's rarely analyzed or even discussed.

I'm talking about the Man (or Woman) on the Street—the supposedly representative citizen who appears in so many news stories as a proxy for the public at large. These people offer no special expertise or inside knowledge; their chief value is their seeming ordinariness.

Earlier this week, in a story datelined Asheville, N.C., The New York Times reported on congressional races featuring relatively conservative Democrats, including former Washington Redskins quarterback Heath Shuler: "Mr. Shuler grew up in a Democratic family, the son of a mailman in Bryson City, N.C. He has set out to bring Democrats who have voted Republican, like Brenda Davis, back into the fold. From behind the counter at the Spud & Deb's hunting and pet supply store in Enka, N.C., Ms. Davis, 41, said she voted Republican in the last election because of her religious beliefs, but this time is supporting Mr. Shuler. 'Considering my son is a marine and he's done two tours in Iraq,' Ms. Davis said, 'I'm with the Democrats.' "

In Britain, they call this a vox pop, from the Latin "vox populi," or "voice of the people." It's a nice phrase, in that it captures both the grandiose pretensions of the device and its actual function as a crude shortcut. Think about it: A single individual, encountered in apparently random fashion, serves as a stand-in for thousands, even millions, of others. The particular becomes the general, all in a matter of a few easy lines.

It's reductive, yet if done with a certain level of craft, oddly effective. The above example works not just on the strength of the quotation, but thanks to that one daub of rustic color. Spud & Deb's is the ur-Mayberry detail that gives the vox its pop. Had the woman been encountered in, say, Wal-Mart, it would have spoiled everything.

These last few weeks have been high season for vox pops, which have been turning up everywhere. As always, in the most laughable ones nameless folk materialize out of nowhere and efficiently spit out exactly the inane nugget the pat story line needs. Thus, ABC News aired a story last weekend about how some well-known American corporations—Home Depot, Target, Starbucks, Domino's Pizza, etc.—make political donations, and it scarily suggested that consumers who buy products and services from those companies are effectively supporting their political choices.

Two vox pops were in the story, both women. The first, a stern schoolmarmy type, was all plain-spun dudgeon: "There's better ways they can use this money than supporting politicians." The second, further down in the story, struck a more resigned tone, thus setting up the denouement: "I'm not too happy, but then at the same time there's not very much I can do besides vote."

And your vote means everything, dear.

But let's not be churlish. Vox pops are a treasure. In a political culture ruled by demography, anecdotal particularity becomes an act of subversion. Yes, they're contrived and not half as random/serendipitous as they pretend to be. The canny reporter trolls far and wide for good vox pops and selects only the best. The vox speaks for the people to the extent that it serves that reporter's crass needs, and not a syllable more. These are narrative instruments.

But as long as they are truly speaking their minds, and we quote them accurately, who cares? The magic of vox pops is the way they are simultaneously singular and representative: In voicing their own views they become something larger than themselves. And what's more American, finally: today's Zogby numbers or the latest poop from Spud & Deb's?

William Powers is a columnist for National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.

Article Tools

E-mail Article
Printer Format

Discuss this article in Post & Riposte.

More from National Journal

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter.

Recent commentary from National Journal

August 7, 2007

Innocents in Prison

Many thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country.

August 7, 2007

The Candidates' Four Detention Camps

Deciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought.

August 7, 2007

Crowd Control

Everybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing.

August 7, 2007

Democratic Slugfest

An exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen.

July 31, 2007

Shortsighted on Judges

Senate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi.

July 31, 2007

Beyond Trade Adjustment Assistance

Workers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons.

July 31, 2007

The Poverty Candidates

John Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda.

July 24, 2007

Are the Democrats Serious?

Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege.

July 24, 2007

Of Church and State

Religion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division.

July 17, 2007

Flying Blind in a Red-Tape Blizzard

Based on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years.


Name

Address 1

Address 2

City

State Zip

Email

Atlantic Voices

The Surge Caused Everything! Read more

24 July 2008 02:42 A.M.

Thought of the Day Read more

23 July 2008 10:50 P.M.

Obama In Berlin Read more

23 July 2008 3:13 P.M.

Gored! Read more

23 July 2008 1:17 P.M.

No Orleans Read more

23 July 2008 5:54 P.M.

I'm not there, so I can't say so first hand, but... Read more

23 July 2008 11:15 P.M.

Marc Ambinder, Blogging Hero Read more

23 July 2008 8:31 P.M.

The CBO on Fannie and Freddie Read more

24 July 2008 08:23 A.M.