D.C. Dispatch September 5, 2006

Democrats have to convince voters that they are strong in confronting terrorism.

by William Schneider

Terrorism Still a Trump Card?

from National Journal

Article Tools

email E-mail Article
print Printer Format

Republicans won the last two elections on the terrorism issue. Will it work a third time?

Three polls out last week give them some rea-son to feel encouraged. President Bush got a 42 percent job-approval rating in the CNN poll, 42 percent in the USA Today/Gallup poll, and 36 percent in the New York Times/CBS News poll. That's an average of 40 percent approval.

Bush's numbers have been rising slowly for the past three months. In April and May, his job ratings reached a low, averaging 34 percent in nonpartisan public polls. In June and July, the average was 38 percent.

Why the improvement? The White House has been using the terrorism issue to rally the Republican base, just as it did in 2002 and 2004. At a Republican fundraiser on August 23, White House political strategist Karl Rove said, "If leading Democrats had their way, our nation would be weaker and the enemies of our nation would be stronger. And that is a stark fact of modern life." And Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman offered this characterization of Democrats in an August 9 speech: "A party that once stood for strength now stands for retreat and defeat, even as our nation faces an ideological enemy as dangerous as any we faced in the 20th century."

Bush's biggest gains have been on the terrorism issue, particularly since the arrest of suspected terrorist plotters in London last month. In fact, terrorism is the only issue on which the president can claim majority support right now. The New York Times/CBS poll and the USA Today/Gallup poll peg Bush's approval rating on terrorism at 55 percent, up 10 points since April. On all other issues—Iraq, the economy, energy, the Middle East—his ratings are below 40 in both polls. Bush has made his biggest gains among Republicans, conservatives, rural Americans, and men, according to the CNN poll. In other words, within his base.

Will the terrorism issue save the Republican majorities in Congress? Late-August polls all show Democrats in the lead, by an average of 9 points, when registered voters nationwide are asked how they will vote for Congress. But some polls show the race tightening. The USA Today/

Gallup poll has the Democratic lead at just 2 points (47 percent to 45 percent). Last week's Hotline poll surveyed likely voters. In that group, the race was a dead heat: 40 percent said they would vote Democratic and 40 percent said Republican. The GOP may be having a problem with middle-of-the-road voters, but it still knows how to rally its base.

Democrats want to frame the debate around the war in Iraq rather than the war on terrorism. Voters are clearly fed up with Iraq. In the CNN poll, 61 percent of Americans now say they oppose the war. Only 35 percent support it, a new low.

Bush is trying to rebuild support for his Iraq policy by sticking to the argument that it's part of the war on terrorism. "I repeat what our leading general said in the region," the president said at his August 21 news conference. "He said that if we withdraw before the job is done, the enemy will follow us here. I strongly agree with that."

But do the American people agree with it? Not any more. In the CNN poll, 52 percent said they view the war in Iraq as a distraction from the war on terrorism, compared with 44 percent who said they think that Iraq is an essential part of the war on terror. The New York Times/CBS News poll found the same thing: For the first time since the U.S. invasion in 2003, a majority of Americans (51 percent) do not see the war in Iraq as part of the war on terror. That gives Democrats an opening.

Just after the 2002 midterm elections, President Clinton warned fellow Democrats: "When people are insecure, they'd rather have somebody who's strong and wrong than somebody who's weak and right." Democrats have to convince voters not only that they are right but also that they are strong in confronting terrorism.

William Schneider is the Cable News Network's senior political analyst. He is also a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., and a contributing editor for the Los Angeles Times, National Journal, and The Atlantic Monthly. His column appears every week in National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.

Article Tools

E-mail Article
Printer Format

More from National Journal

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter.

 

Recent Commentary from National Journal

August 7, 2007

Innocents in Prison

Many thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country.

August 7, 2007

The Candidates' Four Detention Camps

Deciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought.

August 7, 2007

Crowd Control

Everybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing.

August 7, 2007

Democratic Slugfest

An exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen.

July 31, 2007

Shortsighted on Judges

Senate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi.

July 31, 2007

Beyond Trade Adjustment Assistance

Workers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons.

July 31, 2007

The Poverty Candidates

John Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda.

July 24, 2007

Are the Democrats Serious?

Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege.

July 24, 2007

Of Church and State

Religion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division.

July 17, 2007

Flying Blind in a Red-Tape Blizzard

Based on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years.


Name

Address 1

Address 2

City

State Zip

Email

Atlantic Voices

Extreme Brewing Read more

22 November 2008 11:54 A.M.

The Future Beckons Read more

21 November 2008 3:43 P.M.

What a magical time of the year . . . Read more

21 November 2008 4:17 P.M.

"Statement" Read more

21 November 2008 3:29 P.M.

Is it wrong... Read more

22 November 2008 12:00 P.M.

November street scenes, Beijing Read more

22 November 2008 07:10 A.M.

Hillary's Middle East Understanding, and Mickey's Dissent Read more

21 November 2008 10:55 A.M.

Does Obama still want stronger unions? Read more

21 November 2008 2:36 P.M.

Peevish about "spot-on" Read more

21 November 2008 3:24 P.M.