Follow-up August 11, 2006

Yes. James Fallows explains why the foiled airline bombing plot actually strengthens the argument for declaring victory in the war on terror

by James Fallows

Can We Still Declare Victory?

Article Tools

email E-mail Article
print Printer Format

Nearly every one of the military, counterterrorist, and intelligence officials I interviewed for my “Declaring Victory” story in the current Atlantic said that attacks on the United States and Europe would continue to be attempted – and that sooner or later one of them would succeed.

That is: It was not because they failed to imagine news like that of the last few days from London that so many said it was time to declare an end to the “war on terrorism.” It was precisely because they could imagine exactly this news – and worse.  As I reported in the article, the result of thinking about exactly what works, and what doesn’t, in the long-term effort to minimize a terrorist threat, was a conclusion that the United States could best ensure its safety by saying that the “war” period of the anti-terrorism struggle had come to an end.

How can this be? Consider the three main points of the argument in “Declaring Victory”:

First: “Al-Qaeda Central,” the organization that planned and carried out the devastation on 9/11, has been severely disrupted by U.S. and allied activities. Its leaders are in hiding and on the run. Many of their lieutenants have been captured or killed. It has lost its haven in Afghanistan and has not replaced the training sites and face-to-face meeting opportunities it had there. Its leaders cannot easily communicate orders to operatives or transfer money without being tracked down. All measures show that its brutal tactics have cost it support in the Arab and Islamic world.

The news of the last few days confirms rather than undercuts this argument. Western agencies had never successfully penetrated al-Qaeda before 9/11. Now, it appears, they have. The British apparently had the current plotters under surveillance for a sustained period. A recent analysis from the “Stratfor” group pointed out, “Al Qaeda’s defining characteristic has always been its ability to maintain operational security. If that has been compromised, then al-Qaeda’s importance as a force has diminished greatly.”  The London arrests demonstrate this weakened importance.

Pages: 1 2 next>

James Fallows is a national correspondent of The Atlantic.

Article Tools

email E-mail Article
Printer Format
Share

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter.

 

From the Archives

September 2006

Declaring Victory

The United States is succeeding in its struggle against terrorism. The time has come to declare the war on terror over, so that an even more effective military and diplomatic campaign can begin.

From Atlantic Unbound

August 8, 2006

Endgaming the Terror War

James Fallows talks about the surprising strides we've made against al-Qaeda—and why declaring victory will make us safer.

Also By

James Fallows

November 2009

How I Survived China

Our man in Beijing returns home, with lungs only somewhat the worse for wear.

October 2009

Village Dreamers

Two Americans try to save a Chinese town from kitsch.

July/August 2009

Dr. Doom Has Some Good News

Nouriel Roubini is a famous--and famously prescient--economic pessimist. So why is he smiling?


Name

Address 1

Address 2

City

State Zip

Email