D.C. Dispatch July 18, 2006

President Bush's standing among Connecticut Democrats is bad news for Joe Lieberman.

by William Schneider

The Primary Message

from National Journal

Article Tools

email E-mail Article
print Printer Format

STAMFORD, Conn.—The August 8 Democratic Senate primary in Connecticut is supposed to be a one-issue contest. But what that issue will be was at the center of the July 6 debate between Sen. Joe Lieberman and his challenger, Ned Lamont.

"I know George Bush. I've worked against George Bush. I've even run against George Bush," Lieberman said. "But, Ned, I'm not George Bush. So why don't you stop running against him and have the courage and honesty to run against me and the facts of my record?"

Lamont's response? "Ned Lamont is going to stand up and speak on behalf of Democrats.... We're not going to cozy up to the Bush agenda. We're not going to provide a lot of cover for the Bush agenda."

Lieberman is a third-term senator who was on the Democratic national ticket in 2000. Now he's facing a tough fight for re-nomination. Why? One word: Iraq. Lieberman wrote in The Wall Street Journal last November, "What a colossal mistake it would be for America's bipartisan political leadership to choose this moment in history to lose its will and, in the famous phrase, to seize defeat from the jaws of the coming victory." That article enraged Democrats across the country and helped draw a primary challenger into the race.

Each candidate tried to use the July 6 debate to frame the race. For challenger Lamont, the issue is Iraq. "Senator Lieberman cheered on the president every step of the way when we should have been asking the tough questions," Lamont said. Lieberman's response was dismissive: "He's a single-issue candidate who's applying a litmus test to me."

For Lieberman, the issue is himself. In his closing statement, the incumbent said, "The people of Connecticut and I have known each other for a long time. We have laughed and cried together. We prayed and dreamed together. And, most of all, we have worked together."

Fourth District congressional candidate Diane Farrell, a Democrat, disagrees with Lieberman on Iraq, but says she will vote for him in the primary out of personal loyalty. "We have known each other a very long time; we respectfully agree to disagree with one another," she said last week.

It's not clear how many Democrats feel that way. "We don't know if this is a referendum on Iraq or a referendum on Joe Lieberman," David Lightman, Washington bureau chief of The Hartford Courant, said after the debate. Lieberman is running in a primary, and primaries are about sending a message. "I think what's hurting Lieberman the most is the fact that a lot of Democrats think he's not Democratic enough," Lightman said.

Primary voters are not voting on whether to re-elect an incumbent. They're voting to define the party's message. "The senator has seniority," Lamont acknowledged, "but when you use seniority on the wrong side of issues that people care about, that's a problem."

Here's how Lieberman's summed up his campaign: "What I'm saying to the people of Connecticut [is], I can do more for you and your families." His challenger's response? "Senator, this is not about anybody's career. This election is about the people." It's not about you, in other words; it's about us, the Democratic Party.

November is about whether to re-elect the incumbent. That's when Lieberman can count on getting the support of the 4th District's representative, Christopher Shays, who said last week, "I'm going to vote for him. Absolutely." But Shays is a Republican. He can't vote in the Democratic primary.

That's why Lieberman says he will run in November even if he loses in the primary. The November election will be framed his way—about his service, not about the Democratic Party's message. That's a race he apparently can win.

A Quinnipiac University poll taken early last month showed Lamont gaining on Lieberman in the Democratic primary. The same poll showed Lieberman getting 56 percent if he ran as an independent in the general election against Democrat Lamont (18 percent) and Republican Alan Schlesinger (8 percent).

Lieberman's general election support exactly matches his job-approval rating in Connecticut, 56 percent. What threatens Lieberman is President Bush's job-approval rating in the state, which is only 24 percent. Bush's job-approval rating among Connecticut Democrats? Five percent.

William Schneider is the Cable News Network's senior political analyst. He is also a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., and a contributing editor for the Los Angeles Times, National Journal, and The Atlantic Monthly. His column appears every week in National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.

Article Tools

E-mail Article
Printer Format

More from National Journal

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter.

 

Recent Commentary from National Journal

August 7, 2007

Innocents in Prison

Many thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country.

August 7, 2007

The Candidates' Four Detention Camps

Deciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought.

August 7, 2007

Crowd Control

Everybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing.

August 7, 2007

Democratic Slugfest

An exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen.

July 31, 2007

Shortsighted on Judges

Senate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi.

July 31, 2007

Beyond Trade Adjustment Assistance

Workers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons.

July 31, 2007

The Poverty Candidates

John Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda.

July 24, 2007

Are the Democrats Serious?

Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege.

July 24, 2007

Of Church and State

Religion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division.

July 17, 2007

Flying Blind in a Red-Tape Blizzard

Based on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years.


Name

Address 1

Address 2

City

State Zip

Email

Atlantic Voices

Extreme Brewing Read more

22 November 2008 11:54 A.M.

The Future Beckons Read more

21 November 2008 3:43 P.M.

What a magical time of the year . . . Read more

21 November 2008 4:17 P.M.

"Statement" Read more

21 November 2008 3:29 P.M.

Is it wrong... Read more

22 November 2008 12:00 P.M.

November street scenes, Beijing Read more

22 November 2008 07:10 A.M.

Hillary's Middle East Understanding, and Mickey's Dissent Read more

21 November 2008 10:55 A.M.

Does Obama still want stronger unions? Read more

21 November 2008 2:36 P.M.

Peevish about "spot-on" Read more

21 November 2008 3:24 P.M.