D.C. Dispatch June 27, 2006

Polls indicate that Republican voters are more divided over Iraq than are Democrats.

by William Schneider

Split Decisions

from National Journal

Article Tools

email E-mail Article
print Printer Format

The House of Representatives has voted on Iraq. But how representative were its members?

In the House, 37 percent voted in favor of setting a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. Was that vote representative of public opinion on the war? No. In a CNN poll taken last week, just after the president's surprise trip to Baghdad, 53 percent of the public favored setting such a timetable.

Most House Democrats voted with their leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, who said in the debate, "We have a responsibility to not 'stay the course' of thousands of deaths, tens of thousands of injuries.... It's time for us to come home and meet the needs of the American people."

The vote among House Democrats: 78 percent for a timetable, 22 percent against. How well did they represent the views of Democratic voters? Pretty well, actually. Among Democrats nationwide, the CNN poll found that 73 percent supported a timetable for withdrawal and 23 percent were opposed.

The Republican vote in the House was nearly unanimous in favor of the leadership and White House position, as stated by Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill.: "We must renew our resolve that the actions of evildoers will not dictate American policy." A near-unanimous 99 percent of House Republicans voted against setting a timetable. Only three Republicans supported a timetable. One was Rep. John Duncan of Tennessee, who voted against the use of force in Iraq in 2002, saying there was no proof that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

"Mr. Speaker," Duncan said during the House debate on withdrawal, "a few days ago, I found out that a rating service ... rated me as the sixth-most conservative member of this body. And yet I am steadfastly opposed to this war, and I have been since the beginning. Mr. Speaker, we need to start putting our own people first once again and bring our troops home—the sooner the better."

Duncan's position turns out not to be so lonely, however. Nearly one-third (31 percent) of Republican voters nationwide said they favor a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.

House Republican leaders scheduled the vote to seize the offensive in the Iraq debate after the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Al Qaeda's leader in Iraq. Their intention was to expose Democrats as divided over a timetable for withdrawal. They succeeded. In the House vote, Democrats were more divided than Republicans. But in public opinion, Republicans are more divided over Iraq than Democrats are. And anti-war Republicans are becoming alienated from their party's leaders.

One of those alienated Republicans is, or was, James Webb—Vietnam War hero, best-selling author, and secretary of the Navy during the Reagan administration. Webb, a Virginian, supported George W. Bush for president and Republican George Allen for Senate in 2000. But Webb broke with the Republican Party over Iraq. He criticized the decision to invade Iraq in September 2002, six months before the war. "The issue before us is not simply whether the United States should end the regime of Saddam Hussein," Webb wrote in The Washington Post, "but whether we as a nation are prepared to physically occupy territory in the Middle East for the next 30 to 50 years. Those who are pushing for a unilateral war in Iraq know full well that there is no exit strategy if we invade and stay."

Last week, Virginia Democrats nominated Webb to challenge Allen for the Senate. Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said, "With Jim Webb as the Democratic nominee in Virginia, we have an opportunity to give George Allen a real run for his money." In his primary-night victory speech, Webb said, "It's time to welcome home those Democrats who left for a time, the Reagan Democrats, the conservative Democrats.... It's time to welcome them home."

Webb got the blessing of such prominent Democrats as Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts. What Democrats are saying to anti-war Republicans is, "You don't have to be lonely. You come here and stay with us."

William Schneider is the Cable News Network's senior political analyst. He is also a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., and a contributing editor for the Los Angeles Times, National Journal, and The Atlantic Monthly. His column appears every week in National Journal, a weekly magazine covering politics and government published in Washington, D.C.

Article Tools

E-mail Article
Printer Format

More from National Journal

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter.

 

Recent Commentary from National Journal

August 7, 2007

Innocents in Prison

Many thousands of wrongly convicted people are rotting in prisons and jails around the country.

August 7, 2007

The Candidates' Four Detention Camps

Deciding what to do with jihadist operatives is the country's most urgent legal question. But there's little sign that the presidential candidates have given it much thought.

August 7, 2007

Crowd Control

Everybody's buzzing about citizen journalism. But the "journalism" could use some editing.

August 7, 2007

Democratic Slugfest

An exchange of blows between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama was bound to happen.

July 31, 2007

Shortsighted on Judges

Senate Democrats are playing a dangerous political game in opposing confirmation of Leslie Southwick, a wellqualified judicial nominee from Mississippi.

July 31, 2007

Beyond Trade Adjustment Assistance

Workers who lose their jobs because of trade are no more deserving than workers whose jobs disappear for other reasons.

July 31, 2007

The Poverty Candidates

John Edwards made poverty an issue in his 2004 campaign for the White House. This time around, he has company: Barack Obama is also working to put poverty back on the political agenda.

July 24, 2007

Are the Democrats Serious?

Both sides deserve to lose the brewing battle between the White House and Congress over executive privilege.

July 24, 2007

Of Church and State

Religion now looms larger than economic class as a source of political division.

July 17, 2007

Flying Blind in a Red-Tape Blizzard

Based on spending, President Bush appears to be the biggest regulator since the Nixon-Ford years.


Name

Address 1

Address 2

City

State Zip

Email

Atlantic Voices

"Under Coercive Conditions" Read more

22 November 2008 1:20 P.M.

The Future Beckons Read more

21 November 2008 3:43 P.M.

What a magical time of the year . . . Read more

21 November 2008 4:17 P.M.

"Statement" Read more

21 November 2008 3:29 P.M.

Is it wrong... Read more

22 November 2008 12:00 P.M.

November street scenes, Beijing Read more

22 November 2008 07:10 A.M.

Hillary's Middle East Understanding, and Mickey's Dissent Read more

21 November 2008 10:55 A.M.

Does Obama still want stronger unions? Read more

21 November 2008 2:36 P.M.

Peevish about "spot-on" Read more

21 November 2008 3:24 P.M.